We thought we’d be living in space (or under giant domes) by now
We thought we’d be living in space (or under giant domes) by now A proposed space colony designed by NASA researchers in the 1970s. (NASA Ames Research Center/Courtesy Bigelow Aerospace)
We thought we’d be living in space (or under giant domes) by now
Lexile: 1030L

Assign to Google Classroom

The International Space Station is known for a distinct lack of personal space. Crews are packed into phone booth-sized beds and assaulted by continuous light, sound and surveillance. But if things go right during a SpaceX resupply mission this spring, the station could soon be a bit roomier and more relaxing.

After the Dragon capsule reaches the station, the ISS's robot arm will pull out a device. It's called the Bigelow Aerospace Expandable Activity Module, or BEAM, and the future of housing might just change forever.
The 13-foot-long module is being referred to by Bigelow Aerospace and NASA as an "expandable habitat." But to the average viewer it will look more like a big white balloon. Think of it as a kind of spare room, one that cost NASA a cool $17.8 million. BEAM will arrive uninflated, but once it's attached to one of the station's nodes it will blow up. That will create a new - if not entirely expansive - section of the ISS.
"I jokingly refer to it as a largish New York apartment," says Mike Gold. He is director of D.C. operations and business growth for Bigelow Aerospace. BEAM isn't intended to be used as living quarters, he notes. Rather, it will serve as a proof of concept for expandable habitats.
Gold sees another benefit to the module. Call it a bit of peace and quiet. "Acoustically, it's going to be the quietest location aboard the International Space Station," he says. Will astronauts use it as a respite from the always-on environment of the bigger station? Right now, it's unclear. In a release, NASA says only that the station will be measured and tested over time. But Gold thinks the module has the potential as a place for science experiments, stowage and other activities. After all, the concept has been tested before. In 2006 and 2007, the company launched the Genesis I and II missions. Expandable habitats headed into orbit via converted Russian ICBMs.
The limited plans for the habitat are a far cry from the "space hotel" label that has long been associated with the company. Bigelow Aerospace is owned by hotelier and real estate mogul Robert Bigelow. His plans to take his empire to space have been the source of speculation and sometimes mockery since he launched the company. That was in 1998.
That moniker irritates Gold. He calls it a "pernicious misconception." Gold says tourism is just a portion of the company's long-term plan. The term has been in use since the module that inspired Bigelow Aerospace's current projects. It is a NASA-designed inflatable crew quarters project. It's known as TransHab.
TransHab turned out to be just a pipe dream.  The project's funding was cut in 2000. It literally never left the ground. Bigelow snatched up NASA's patent rights. He used them to develop the technology.
If BEAM isn't a space hotel, the company's next project sure seems like one. Now that BEAM is ready to deploy, the company is perfecting the B330. It's an even larger expandable habitat. It could be used for housing, research and development. It also could be used for astronaut training.
Unlike BEAM, the B330, named for its 330 cubic meters of internal space, is a completely independent module.  It doesn't need to hook up to the International Space Station. And it can support a crew of up to six. B330s can even be hooked up to one another. They could form free-floating commercial stations like Alpha Station. Alpha is a proposed space station. Bigelow Aerospace claims it could help nations develop their astronaut corps, perfect space travel and conduct research.
On its website, the company says it will offer things like one-off astronaut flights ($26.75 million to $36.75 million per seat), leased space station space ($25 million for exclusive use of a school bus-sized space over a two-month period) and naming rights to Alpha Station ($25 million a year). Gold downplays the idea of space tourism, but doesn't discount it entirely. Perhaps it will be more lucrative, and realistic, once the company's ambitious Olympus project, named for its godly 2,100 cubic meters of space, is complete.
There are still challenges to be addressed. Right now, the company relies on commercial resupply missions to the space station launched by companies like SpaceX to get its smaller modules into orbit. But commercial rockets are small. Many don't have enough power to launch the 20-ton B330. Bigelow notes that it designed that unit to fly on an Atlas V rocket, a dependable vehicle that has a launch capacity of just over 40,000 pounds. To get its more ambitious habitats off the ground, Bigelow Aerospace will probably need a rocket like NASA's upcoming Space Launch System, or SLS. It will have an eventual lift capacity of 286,000 pounds.
Are expandable space stations (hotels or otherwise) the buildings of the future? Perhaps. Some people may ditch the idea of space tourism and become full-time space residents in structures like Bigelow's Olympus. Some may flee Earth due to overpopulation. (There's an 80 percent probability that the world's population will grow to around 11 billion by the end of this century, and there are no signs of slowing).
And then there's the cool factor. Some people may find that they simply prefer to live in microgravity surrounded by spectacular views of planets and stars all the time.
But commercial space projects are susceptible to funding issues, delays and development traffic jams, all of which could send the most optimistic predictions for the future of travel and housing tumbling back to Earth. And for every futuristic habitat success, there are scores of stalled or vastly altered projects.
What do you think the future of living in space will look like?

Source URL: https://www.tweentribune.com/article/tween78/we-thought-wed-be-living-space-or-under-giant-domes-now/

Filed Under:  
Assigned 175 times
Why does the International Space Station lack personal space?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • mattb-ver
    4/08/2016 - 11:59 p.m.

    It lacks personal space because it's very expensive to make it bigger and it also takes time

  • alexism148512-
    4/11/2016 - 11:08 a.m.

    It lacks personal space because it costs 17.8 million to build a 13 foot module. It would cost to much to make it any bigger.

  • michaelg-ver
    4/11/2016 - 12:52 p.m.

    It lacks personal space because it is mostly equipment an experiments used for serious purposes. Also the Astronauts need a small space so they don't float away in their sleep.

  • tiernanj-obr
    4/11/2016 - 02:44 p.m.

    Why does the International Space Station or ISS lack personal space?
    It could be because there needs to be lots of room for equipment. It could also be because the astronauts don't really need the sleeping quarters big because most of their day they are working and N.A.S.A probably doesn't want to spend money on stuff they don't really need. I wonder if the hotel will actually be put into space. That might be why the ISS lack personal space.

  • ellas-obr
    4/11/2016 - 02:49 p.m.

    The International Space Station lacks personal space because it holds many experiments and equipment. Now NASA is probably sending up supplies to be held in the new addition to the space station. Astronauts find it hard to sleep and hard to live in there because it is all stuffed together. The text says ''Crews are packed into phone booth-sized beds, and are assaulted by continuous light, sound, and surveillance." The astronauts are going to be very happy when the inflatable living space is added on to the station!

  • khyonc-ric
    4/11/2016 - 04:12 p.m.

    The International Space Station lacks personal space because it is in outer space and with the low gravity it can be hard to navigate.In outer space with low gravity it might be easy to bump into eachother and maybe because the station is small.With the mix of small quarters
    and low gravity the station can be difficult to be in.

  • andrewk-1-ric
    4/11/2016 - 04:23 p.m.

    I think the international space station lack personal space because one the price to make larger living quarters would be very expensive, also the money that would be used to expand could take away for time they actually have in space. Another reason is that they probably don't have the time to expand

  • mmeola21-mar
    4/12/2016 - 09:53 a.m.

    Everything inside the ISS is relatively close to each other. The beds are tiny & there isn't exactly individual rooms for the astronauts.

  • btanant76-mar
    4/12/2016 - 09:54 a.m.

    The international space station lack personal space is because is costs a lot of money & it takes a lot of time.

  • atukes21-mar
    4/12/2016 - 09:55 a.m.

    The International Space Station lacks personal space because for them to make it bigger will cost a lot of money and a lot of time. They could use that money for better reasons like testing and stuff. They need their time so they can try new things. They are better off having a lack of personal space.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment