How the U.S. Army saved our national parks Company M, 1st U.S. Cavalary, from Fort Custerm Montana Territory, marching into Mammoth Hot Springs; August,1886. (NPS)
How the U.S. Army saved our national parks
Lexile

Capt. Moses Harris and his troops from Company M, First Cavalry marched into Yellowstone in August 1886. The world's first national park was in chaos, they found.

Fourteen years of corrupt or incompetent management threatened its existence. There had been little protection of the park's natural wonders. Congressional funding was an afterthought. But by the time the Army handed Yellowstone's administration to the fledgling National Park Service 30 years later, it had set in motion policies and procedures. They would serve as the model for park management for decades to come.
 
Would there even be a national parks system today without the cavalry's stewardship of Yellowstone?
 
"It's been debated. Nobody knows," says Lee Whittlesey. He has worked at Yellowstone for 35 years and been the park historian since 2000. "I would submit the Army went a long way towards protecting an area that had very little protection and turned it into a place of relative tranquility."
 
Without that intervention, he adds, "Congress might have thrown up its hands and turned it over to private settlement. There certainly were a fair number of voices yelling for that in Congress."
 
Yellowstone was designated as a national park in 1872. The Department of the Interior was charged with the "preservation, from injury or spoliation, of all timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or wonders within said park."
 
But prior to Harris' arrival, there was rampant poaching. Bison, elk, deer and other animals were endangered. Buffalo Bill Cody had written a letter to the New York Sun newspaper. He pleaded for protections. Timber cutting and grazing left swaths of land devastated. Fires set by angry settlers destroyed acre after acre. Vandals sliced fragile pieces of ornate travertine with axes to sell as souvenirs. And they signed their names on geyser formations.
 
Congress was angry with the inept administration of the park. It refused to allocate funds, according to Whittlesey. As part of a compromise agreement to fund the park, control shifted to the military. The soldiers were under the direction of the Department of the Interior.
 
The first troop of about 60 men was 50 more than had covered the 2.2 million acres of the park under civilian administrations. Their numbers grew to two troops, then three and eventually four by 1910. Visitors to the park increased from 500 in 1880 to more than 19,000 in 1910.
 
Within two months of arriving in 1886, Harris reported to the secretary of the Interior that the forests and the game "has been well protected." But progress was slow to prevent vandalism to the geysers.
 
"Not one of the notable geyser formations in the Park has escaped mutilation or defacement in some form," he wrote, noting the lack of effective rules, regulations and especially penalties. "All sorts of worthless and disreputable characters are attracted here by the impunity afforded by the absence of law and courts of justice."
 
Early military commanders at Yellowstone kept a close watch on geysers. They charted eruptions. Soldiers stood sentry, forcing those caught signing their names to scrub off the offending graffiti. 
 
Despite the early optimism, poachers proved to be an enduring problem. This was partly because there were no significant penalties on the books. Harris created extra-legal measures, Whittlesey says. Harris confiscated the offenders' possessions and locked offenders in the guardhouse for weeks before expelling them from the park. It was his only recourse.
 
Only in 1894, five years after Harris left Yellowstone, did Congress heed his request to pass a "stringent law." Soldiers caught a local poacher named Edgar Howell standing over the carcasses of bison he slaughtered for their scalps. The scalps fetched $300 apiece. A photographer and writer from Field & Stream magazine happened to be in the park that day. Their story about the crime prodded Congress to rush through a bill.
 
Whittlesey notes that the military did manipulate nature, stocking trout, for instance, and bringing in bison from Texas and Montana to breed when the park's herd dropped to only 23 animals in 1902. But acting superintendents also pushed back against projects they saw as despoiling the "natural condition."
 
Capt. F.A. Boutelle succeeded Harris and soon clashed with his superior in Washington over the proposed construction of an elevator that would transport tourists to the bottom of Yellowstone's Grand Canyon for a better view of the 308-foot Lower Falls. Boutelle not only objected to the elevator, but any commercialization of the park. He won. Washington officials revoked permission to build the elevator, and his objection to commercialization became an enduring national parks philosophy.
 
The military administration at Yellowstone proved to be a model for the early management of Yosemite, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks in California. With the creation of the National Park Service in 1916, the soldiers withdrew.
 
Naturalist John Muir noted his appreciation for the military's stewardship in his 1901 book, Our National Parks: "The national parks are not only withdrawn from sale and entry like the forest reservations, but are efficiently managed and guarded by small troops of United States cavalry," he wrote, calling it a refreshing thing compared to the ruthless destruction in adjacent regions.
 
"In pleasing contrast to the noisy, ever changing management, or mismanagement, of blundering, plundering, money-making vote-sellers who receive their places from boss politicians as purchased goods," he added, "the soldiers do their duty so quietly that the traveler is scarce aware of their presence."

Filed Under:  
Assigned 21 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
Why did the national parks need to be protected?
Write your answers in the comments section below


COMMENTS (8)
  • lucasl-3-bar
    6/02/2016 - 12:35 a.m.

    National parks need to be protected because they hold the untouched natural wildlife that exist nowhere else in the nation. Without these parks, the environment is destroyed and the biosphere crippled. These parks inspire people to make a change for the better to help the planet, and without them, we lose that inspiration. The article was very interesting, as it effectively illustrates how the army saved our national parks, and thus, our Earth.

  • calvinh-4-bar
    6/02/2016 - 01:07 p.m.

    The national parks needed to be protected because of the inhabitants that live within them need to be protected so the area is able to have a functioning environment. The national parks not only keep the environment running, but they are also a major tourist attraction, which helps the national park stay in business.
    I found this article interesting because I hope to one day be able to go to a few of the national parks near me.

  • reidi-4-bar
    6/02/2016 - 04:09 p.m.

    In 1886 a general and his troops went in to Yellowstone national park and they saved it f on being destroyed. After they went in to the park after 30 years they enforced rules and policies that helped the park stay nice.

  • jacks-6-bar
    6/02/2016 - 08:25 p.m.

    The national parks needed to be protected as poaching, vandalism, and other disruptions disturbed the peace and beauty of their environments. Naturalist John Muir wrote: "In pleasing contrast to the noisy, ever changing management, or mismanagement, of blundering, plundering, money-making vote-sellers… the soldiers do their duty so quietly that the traveler is scarce aware of their presence." He also stated, like many others, that he was glad to have the wildlife preserved and the magnificent environment protected. In order to achieve this demanding desire, the poachers and vandals would need to be apprehended. The only way to do this efficiently would be to call in the army and calvary themselves to enforce the strict restrictions, especially when the parks were just developing. The parks needed protecting as to preserve the natural beauty their, and to prevent others (and punish them while the sluggish Congress could hardly respond) from ruining it.
    The article was interesting: I can't believe how apparently essential the national parks are for there to be militarized protection.

  • matthewp-6-bar
    6/03/2016 - 12:33 a.m.

    The national parks in 1886 needed to be protected. The reason for this is because people were ruining the parks by cutting down trees or farming the land. No one was stopping them until the U.S. cavalry showed up and did stop them. This is shown in the article by," Capt. Moses Harris and his troops from Company M, First Cavalry marched into Yellowstone in August 1886. The world's first national park was in chaos, they found." My opinion about this article is that it is weird to think there might not be any national parks if the soldiers did not show up.

  • justiny-2-bar
    6/03/2016 - 10:10 a.m.

    National parks need to be protected because it is a wildlife sanctuary and tons of animals call it their home. The y need to be protected because it is a way for people to get in touch with nature. I found it surprising that an army went and protected one of our national parks.

  • maxwellc-3-bar
    6/10/2016 - 01:21 a.m.

    The national parks need to be protected because "Fourteen years of corrupt or incompetent management threatened its existence. There had been little protection of the park's natural wonders. Congressional funding was an afterthought." Of course, the article goes on to talk about how this all has changed, but I wonder how this situation got so bad in the first place.

  • jacksonm-4-bar
    6/10/2016 - 10:40 a.m.

    National parks are protected by the army because of people. People go on the US parks are do whatever they want unless people are the to protect the park. When people protect the park the park is better for animals and the people camping there.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT