Have drones gone too far?
Have drones gone too far? At left is the South Lawn of the White House (AP photo / Thinkstock)
Have drones gone too far?
Lexile: 1080L

Assign to Google Classroom

A small drone flying low to the ground crashed onto the White House grounds, triggering a major emergency response and raising fresh questions about security at the presidential mansion. A man later came forward to say he was responsible and didn't mean to fly it over the complex.

The man contacted the Secret Service after reports of the crash spread in the media, a U.S. official said. The man told the agency that he had been flying the drone recreationally. The man is a Washington resident and is cooperating with investigators.

Although President Barack Obama was not at home, the security breach prompted a lockdown of the entire complex until officials could examine the drone. The White House later said it did not pose a threat.

The drone crashed on the southeast side of the White House grounds just after 3 a.m. Monday, Secret Service spokesman Brian Leary said.

Secret Service agents are interviewing other people to corroborate the man's story. They don't currently have any reason to doubt the man's story, the official said.

The device was described as a two-foot-long quadcopter. It's a commercially available unmanned aircraft that is lifted by four propellers. Many small quadcopters are essentially sophisticated toys. They can also be useful for commercial operations like aerial photography and inspections. Often weighing only a few pounds, they sell for as little as a few hundred dollars or less. Many were popular Christmas gifts last year.

The president and first lady Michelle Obama were traveling in India. Their daughters, Sasha and Malia, may have been at home. White House officials declined to comment on the daughters' whereabouts Monday. But ahead of the president's trip, aides had said the daughters would remain in Washington so as not to miss school.

"The early indications are that it does not pose any sort of ongoing threat to anybody at the White House," said presidential spokesman Josh Earnest.

Still, the incident was likely to reinvigorate a long-running public debate about the use of commercial drones in U.S. skies, as well as White House security. The Secret Service is still recovering after a string of breaches that raised questions about whether the president is adequately protected.

The recent proliferation of inexpensive drones has prompted growing fears about potential collisions with traditional aircraft. Technological advances have also made it easier to equip drones with advanced capabilities such as cameras. That's raised privacy issues as well as concerns that such devices could carry weapons.

Industry experts said that to carry and fire a weapon, a drone would need more engines and more propellers than most commercially manufactured quadcopters.

Critical thinking challenge: Give two reasons why the drone did not pose a threat to the president.

Source URL: https://www.tweentribune.com/article/tween78/have-drones-gone-too-far/

Filed Under:  
Assigned 34 times

  • mikeym-
    9/18/2015 - 07:53 a.m.

    The drone did not pose a threat to the president because the drone was not equipped with any weapons or cameras so therefore the drone was not there to do any harm to anybody it is also only a few pounds and a couple feet in length so it doesn't have much size to it, to do much damage if it crashed.

  • michaelk-
    9/18/2015 - 07:57 a.m.

    Two reasons why the drone didn't pose a threat to the president, one the drone crashed in the yard. An the other one is that the president wasn't even home at the time it happened.

  • sarahm-
    9/18/2015 - 07:58 a.m.

    The drone did not pose a threat to the president because it did not have any weapons attached to it and was being used for fun. It did not have any cameras on it and did not go into the White House. It only flew over the fence and was not close enough to cause any harm.

  • sbrei-wim4
    4/22/2016 - 12:53 p.m.

    I really don't see what the problem is. Yet I do understand that it is better to be safe than sorry. But the throne showed no real threat. I MEAN REALLY IT'S A DRONE.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment