This photo shows fossil-like rock found in Australia containing hints of life from 4.1 billion years ago. Life on a near primordial Earth may have been around 4.1 billion years ago, 300 million years earlier than thought, hints a chemical fossil-like rock found in Australia. It also gives more hope for life elsewhere in the universe. (Bruce Watson/PNAS/AP)
What did life on earth look like 4 billion years ago?
October 26, 2015
Assign to Google Classroom
Scientists have found fossil-like hints that some kind of life existed on Earth 4.1 billion years ago. Back then the planet was a mere volcanic toddler. That's 300 million years earlier for life to pop up than previously thought.
Not only does that change the way scientists thought Earth was like soon after it formed 4.5 billion years ago, but it also gives them reason to theorize that life itself is more plentiful throughout the universe. That is because it seemed to start up so quickly.
Researchers examined tiny grains of the mineral zircon. It is found in western Australia's Jack Hills. The scientists chemically dated them to when Earth was barely 400 million years old. Inside one of the grains, they found what they call a "chemo-fossil." It is a certain mix of carbon isotopes. This is according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Think of it as "the gooey remains of biotic life or anything more complicated," said study co-author Mark Harrison. He is a UCLA geochemistry professor.
There are different types of carbon with different weights. This carbon residue had a higher percentage of the lighter type of carbon. It's what scientists usually find in remnants of life. Think of it as the same as if your finger decayed, Harrison said. There are rare cases where this particular carbon signature wouldn't be from life. But they are exceedingly unusual and only in certain situations.
Harrison theorizes that the carbon is from a colony of tiny organisms of some unknown type. Life existing 300 million years earlier than science thought is the most logical and simplest explanation. But "this is not smoking gun evidence," Harrison said.
The common thinking of early volcanic Earth is that it was too molten. The belief has been that there was not enough liquid water for life to take hold this early. But, Harrison said, there's no physical evidence for this theory. What the zircon shows is "the Earth by 4.1, 4.2 billion years ago was basically behaving like it is today."
"This is what transformative science is all about," said Stephen Mojzsis. He is a University of Colorado scientist who wasn't part of the research. "If life is responsible for these signatures, it arrives fast and early."
S. Blair Hedges of Temple University also wasn't part of the study. The professor said Harrison's findings make sense. The accelerated timeline of life fits with his own genetic tracking work.
"If life arose relatively quickly on Earth," Hedges wrote in an email, "then it could be common in the universe."
Assigned 189 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
Why does the presence of water factor into scientists thinking about life on earth?
Write your answers in the comments section below