TV outpaces Hollywood on diversity John Krasinski, left, and Academy President Cheryl Boone Isaacs announce the Academy Awards nominations for best performance by an actor in a leading role at the 88th Academy Awards nomination ceremony in Beverly Hills, Calif. (Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP/Matt Sayles, File)
TV outpaces Hollywood on diversity
Lexile

Hollywood continues to be rocked by a backlash to the lack of diversity in the Oscar nominations and in the film industry at large. But it doesn't have to look far for inspiration. Just turn on the TV.
 
Where the movies have lagged, television has recently exploded with diversity. Now, the film industry will be playing catch-up to the small screen.  Television is where some of the most talented people of color have turned for greater artistic freedom. It provides the chance to tell more varied stories.
 
Many previous Oscar nominees are already there.
 
Ava DuVernay is the director of last year's best picture-nominee, "Selma."  Now she is at work on "Queen Sugar." It is a drama series for Oprah Winfrey's OWN. John Ridley, the Oscar-winning screenwriter of "12 Years a Slave," is in the second season of his acclaimed ABC series, "American Crime." 

Forest Whitaker, who won best actor for 2006's "The Last King of Scotland," is part of a "Roots" remake for A&E. Two-time Oscar nominee Viola Davis is on Shonda Rhimes' "How to Get Away With Murder" for ABC.
 
"TV cares about its audience," says Davis. In September, she became the first African-American to win an Emmy for best actress in a drama. "TV wants to cater to the demographics of what is America."
 
Television is a faster, livelier medium than film. Movies regularly take years to make. TV also has some structural advantages. Power in Hollywood is still largely held by the six major studios and a handful of other large production companies. In television, there's a true ocean of opportunity. It includes cable and streaming networks with deep pockets and a willingness for riskier material.
 
The TV landscape was less diverse just a few years ago, but for now it's flush with the likes of Lee Daniels' "Empire," Aziz Ansari's "Master of None" and Jill Soloway's "Transparent."
 
To compete in an increasingly crowded media landscape, studios invest in fewer films. Instead, they focus on blockbusters. Those can sell tickets around the globe. It's a strategy that has been largely working. A record $11.1 billion was spent at the box office in 2015. But it has put a stranglehold on distinct voices, of any color, who find little daylight between hulking franchises.
 
As a producer, Whitaker twice found rejection at the studios before raising money independently for 2013's "Fruitvale Station."
 
"We're taking a leap on stories that maybe somebody else says they just don't get," Whitaker said when releasing "Dope."
 
New streaming platforms have provided channels for some filmmakers. Spike Lee, who has said he won't attend the Oscars, found a home for his latest film with Amazon. The child soldier drama "Beasts of No Nation" came from Netflix. It provided the much-praised but un-nominated performance by Idris Elba.
 
"We must do a better job of cultivating and recognizing diversity," said Chris Dodd.  He is the chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America. "The film community is better served when a wider array of voices is celebrated."
 
But in today's uniform Hollywood, variety of any kind is hard to come by. Additional change is often measured in the makeup of franchises.
 
Two of 2015's most popular films were "Furious 7" and "Star Wars: The Force Awakens." They earned more than $1 billion. Their casts came closer to reflecting American society and moviegoers than blockbusters of the past. After years of white superheroes, Marvel has enlisted Ryan Coogler to direct its "Black Panther" movie.
 
Darnel Hunt is the head of UCLA's Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American studies and warns against viewing actions of diversity as symbols of deeper progress.
 
"I don't think most of the public is aware of what goes on behind the scenes and how exclusionary the business really is. Particularly if you see people of color on screen, which you do increasingly see on television," says Hunt. "But if you look behind the scenes, you don't see nearly as much diversity."
 
Hunt co-authors UCLA's annual Hollywood Diversity Report. Year after year, the results have been negative. Minorities make up nearly 40 percent of the U.S. population, but they get only 17 percent of the lead roles in theatrical films. Hollywood executives are 94 percent white and almost entirely male. Though TV has made some strides in front of the camera, its boardrooms and writers' rooms remain largely white and male, too. 
 
"We are light years away. The lack of nominations was, to me, almost a perfect reflection of what the industry looks like," says Hunt. "TV seems more open because they're making a lot more TV. So there are more opportunities for women and minorities. But not in the key decision-making positions."

Filed Under:  
Assigned 224 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
Why is there more diversity on TV than in movies?
Write your answers in the comments section below


COMMENTS (54)
  • jahir-orv
    2/10/2016 - 11:53 a.m.

    it's easy for anyone to just turn on the television and see what movie is on. Especially antenna TV or cable television.
    Because antenna TV they don't give you many choices on what to watch.

    • cammeronm2-hei
      2/12/2016 - 03:27 p.m.

      I agree with you. TV does have movies on it to.

  • jackr-2-bar
    2/11/2016 - 07:55 p.m.

    The article states,"TV cares about its audience," says Davis. In September, she turned into the primary African-American to win an Emmy for best on-screen character in a dramatization. "TV wants to cater to the demographics of what is America." TV is broadly accessible to all Americans, and the reason is they have to speak to all gatherings of people present in the US. Motion pictures are more costly to watch and purchase, so the motion picture industry has been concentrating on one specific business sector, which just so happens to be individuals of white foundation. I preferred this article. I have done some acting, and I get a kick out of the chance to think about the motion picture and TV industry.

  • farisp-pla
    2/12/2016 - 02:38 a.m.

    In summary, the article analyzes the comparison between Hollywood and television for which one has the most diversity in entertainment and has concluded that television is out performing Hollywood by a massive amount. The reason why is because film studios are focusing more on blockbusters that have performed and sold well in the past and are hoping to ride on the jet stream for easy profit. Television shows have recently started taking different turns that turn out to be successful and original. I believe that competition between film studios and television departments is healthy by capitalistic means, but sometime down in the future both television and film will be at a stand still as to what they want their next big production to be.

  • chass2-hei
    2/12/2016 - 11:15 a.m.

    TV show have more diversity is because their are season and movies dont have season so that is why there is not as much diversity than TV show

  • mariannae-hei
    2/12/2016 - 01:37 p.m.

    There is more diversity on TV than in movies because most movies are based on some ones past. Also because they don't need all of the people that you need in movies. There is diversity on TV because the writers look for race, body type, hair color and more.

  • ronyy-hei
    2/12/2016 - 01:37 p.m.

    It on TV because TV has more audience than movies. And show more different people that watch.

  • cammeronm2-hei
    2/12/2016 - 03:26 p.m.

    I think that TV is better. TV is better because it has new things on and can be more realistic.

  • soohyun-cam
    2/13/2016 - 05:00 a.m.

    There are more diversity on TV than in movies because minorites have more opportunities to be in TV programs

  • jungwonk-cam
    2/13/2016 - 08:24 a.m.

    There is more diversity on TV than in movies because there are more opportunities for women and minorities. So it shows people that the TV is more open to people. Also, it provides the chance to tell more varied stories.

  • danielk1-cam
    2/16/2016 - 04:03 a.m.

    TV cares more about diversity than the movies because "TV cares about its audience", said Davis. According to the Hunt, minorities made up nearly 40 percent of the U.S. population. Therefore TV should care about more in diversity, unless the 40% of U.S. people don't watch TV.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT