Life without laptops?
Life without laptops? Airport staff inform passengers at the entrance to the Casablanca - New York flight checkpoint at Casablanca Mohammed V International Airport on Thursday, March 29, 2017. (AP Photo/ Abdeljalil Bounhar/AP Photo/Peter Dejong, File)
Life without laptops?
Lexile: 900L

Assign to Google Classroom

International air travelers might soon rediscover magazines. They may also pick up paperbacks and playing cards, too.
Airline passengers have become hooked on their laptops and tablets. The machines help to get work done. Or, they are used to kill time during long flights. But U.S. aviation-security officials appear determined to ban large electronic devices in the cabin of flights from Europe.
Business travelers are worried about lost productivity. In addition, laptops in checked baggage could be stolen or damaged. Some passengers have considered even leaving the machine home. That is if their employer won't let them check it on a plane. Parents are pondering how to keep children occupied.
Now, U.S. and European Union officials have exchanged information about threats to aviation. These are believed to include bombs hidden in laptop computers. Airline and travel groups are concerned about the possibility that a ban on laptops and tablet computers that currently applies to mostly Middle Eastern flights will be expanded. That ban might be extended to include U.S.-bound flights from Europe.
The airlines are still talking to government officials about how a laptop ban would look at European airports. It will require one set of screening rules for U.S.-bound travelers. Another set of rules would be required for people headed elsewhere.
Nearly 400 flights leave Europe for the U.S. each day. They carry about 85,000 people. The figures are according to the airline industry and U.S. government figures.

The laptop ban in March covered far fewer flights. It was about 50 on an average day. It hurt Middle Eastern carriers by targeting their hub airports. Emirates blamed the ban among factors reducing demand. It has scaled back flights to the U.S.
Expanding the ban to Europe will hit American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines and their European partners. And it will affect many more travelers.

Airlines fear that expanding the ban will lead to more flight delays and increase their liability for theft or damage to electronics devices in checked luggage. Safety advocates worry that putting devices with lithium batteries in the cargo hold will create a fire threat.
Airline groups propose several alternatives to the laptop ban. These include more use of machines that detect residue from explosives. Or, turning devices on to demonstrate that they are not bombs. They may also sort low-risk passengers from high-risk ones. This is presumably to let frequent travelers keep their laptops in the cabin.
Michael McCormick is the executive director of the Global Business Travel Association. He said he believes the threat identified by security officials is real. But he said the laptop ban will hurt business travel, at least in the short term.
The International Air Transport Association is a trade group for global airlines. The association said banning laptops in the cabin would cost passengers $1.1 billion a year.
"Businesses will cancel trips rather than risk having laptops checked due to risk to confidential information," said the group's CEO. He is Alexandre de Juniac.
Edward Pizzarello is an investor in a Washington-area venture-capital firm. He also writes a travel blog. Pizzarello is holding off booking a July business trip to Germany and the United Kingdom. This is "until I figure out what's going on."
"Maybe I don't take the trip," he said. "That's one of the options. It's not my first option."
Small business consultant Gene Marks said he and many of his clients work when flying to and from Europe. Still, he tried to put the annoyance of a ban in perspective.
"I would be more anxious if there was a bomb on my flight," Marks said. Besides, he said, he sees plenty of business travelers who spend the flight sleeping.

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 273 times
Why wasn’t this an issue before?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • alant-
    5/31/2017 - 08:36 a.m.

    Because people wouldnt use the laptops that often as they do now a days with electronics on the plane.

  • aliviar-kut1
    5/31/2017 - 09:10 p.m.

    Having your laptop be stolen or damaged would be terrible, especially if it was stolen! I have had my phone stolen and that wasnt a very good experience.

  • breannam-kut
    6/04/2017 - 10:10 a.m.

    I don't know if I like them banning laptops on flights like it said people can lose business without it.But I do understand that they can get stolen and broken and people can hide bombs in cases and it can cause a fire so I do understand why that are banning them.

  • ashleel-kut
    6/04/2017 - 06:59 p.m.

    I agree that if laptops and other large devises could be bombs then airlines shall ban them. I therefore also disagree with Europe about banning them because of the chaos it would cause. For example, if parents have a child that is occupied by a laptop or tablet, they may be able to relax or even sleep without disruptions to themselves or other passengers trying to get some shut-eye during their trip. Also, meanwhile laptops and large devises are not banned, co-workers can get some work done without having to stress about getting work done later in the trip when their bosses are yelling at them. In conclusion, laptops should be checked, but not snooped in. They shouldn't be banned either.

  • martyp-kut
    6/05/2017 - 07:47 a.m.

    I wonder why this issue is just coming up maybe it is because terrorists decided bombs could be snuck in so everything is on high alert?

  • lauraw-kut
    6/05/2017 - 07:58 p.m.

    I would be very concerned if there was a bomb on my flight, but I couldn't imagine flying 4,255 miles without anything to do. If it was a life or death situation I would fork over my computer. It also hurts people in the work industry because they would have to get all there work done before they left. Instead of while they are waiting.

  • aleezial-boo
    6/05/2017 - 09:15 p.m.

    It wasn't an issue before because there was no such thing as bombs being in a computer and there wasn't as much terrorism. Another reason why is because there weren't people really out there stealing confidential information from other peoples laptops.

  • graceh-kut
    6/05/2017 - 10:11 p.m.

    There are a lot of pros and cons to this idea. For one there is a risk of bombs in the electronic devices (laptops or digital computers). But on another hand passengers with children cant entertain their kids as well as employers/employees can't get work done on long flights. Personally I believe they should do everything they can to allow these devices. For example designing a detector in which they can run the computers threw before flight.

  • chadg-kut
    6/06/2017 - 10:50 a.m.

    Because the terrorist and we need to be carful because there is more thret and we should just scane the laptops

  • ninah-kut
    6/06/2017 - 12:26 p.m.

    i think that airlines didn't do this before because they think that they where needed or important. Also i think that airlines should ban laptops or big electronics because 1 they wont brainwash all of the children and 2 you wont have to worry about your expensive devices being stolen.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment