Library of Congress puts spotlight on 440 snapshots
Library of Congress puts spotlight on 440 snapshots "Nice Feather Duster" 1891 (Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division)
Library of Congress puts spotlight on 440 snapshots
Lexile: 860L

Assign to Google Classroom

The photograph’s caption says it all: “Nice Feather Dusters.”

Three of these cleaning tools appear clasped in the right hand of a late 19th-century peddler. His untidy pseudo-necktie undermines his straight-laced expression. Another is poking awkwardly out of a bag by his left side. They do not look like a feather duster. Instead, they look like the back end of a richly plumed bird.

In another featured photo, an 11-month-old appears to do the impossible. He appears to raise himself into a pull-up. 

The man behind the camera was a teenaged Stanley Kubrick. He was later known for sci-fi inclinations. But there’s no trick of the light happening here. Look closely and you’ll see that the baby, Kent, is being supported by bodybuilder Gene Jantzen. That was his father. He cradles the baby in one hand as if he’s lighter than air.

These snapshots are two of roughly 440 featured in a show. The show is called “Not an Ostrich: And Other Images from America’s Library.” It is a collaborative exhibition now on view at the Annenberg Space for Photography. The space is in Los Angeles. 

The show draws on the Library of Congress’ photographic archives. They include more than 14 million images. The span three centuries. Anne Wilkes Tucker was the curator. She notes in a statement, moments of “glamour, worship, invention, bravery, humor, cruelty and love.”

Tucker is curator emerita at Houston’s Museum of Fine Arts. She tells the New York Times’ James Estrin that she spent a year and half sifting through the library’s vast archives. The curator estimates that she studied one million of the 14 million total photos. That's according to the Cut’s Melania Hidalgo.

Initially, Tucker selected images based on her gut reaction. But she soon followed a different path. She decided to pursue a more inclusive representation. She wanted to include the country’s diverse regions and religions She also wanted to include the diverse demographic groups. 

The final group of photographs elevates unknown images to the level of famous ones. Take the playful shot “Brünnhilde,” which captures the profile of a cat in a Viking helmet. It is placed alongside Dorothea Lange’s “Migrant Mother”. 

The show traces the evolution of photography from the daguerreotype to digital. Older selections include an 1839 self-portrait informally dubbed the “world’s first selfie." Another is the earliest known portrait of Harriet Tubman. Newer shots include a 2006 snapshot. It is of a couple dining at Wendy’s on Halloween. One of them is in civilian wear and the other is decked-out in a chicken suit. And there is a pair of portraits depicting a 16-year-old girl on the first and last day of her treatment for an eating disorder.

“Not an Ostrich” derives its name from a 1930 photo of actress Isla Bevin. It was taken at the 41st-annual Poultry Show in Madison Square Garden. She is holding not an ostrich as the caption suggests. Instead, she is holding a prize-winning “Floradora Goose.”

A blog post describes the show. LOC staffers Beverly Brannan, Adam Silvia and Helena Zinkham write that the show reminds viewers to ask, “What are we looking at?” It’s a big question. And it's one without an easy answer. As photographic theorist Susan Sontag noted in 2003, the image is “both objective record and personal testimony, both a faithful copy or transcription of an actual moment of reality and an interpretation of that reality.”

The Annenberg–LOC collaboration represents a chance for anyone to delve into America’s past. The exhibition itself features high-resolution digitizations of the original images. Its online counterpart includes hundreds of previously unseen snapshots, many of which are free for public use.

“[The exhibition is] really to make people aware that this incredible resource is available and largely free,” Tucker tells Hyperallergic’s Claire Voon. “I’m also hoping that people will learn from it, and understand that pictures are an access into history.”

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 86 times
How do you think digitizing images could help the public?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • calebr-orv2
    8/22/2018 - 12:23 p.m.

    I think that pictures help the public because they tell the story a little and the picture gives the people something to get an image in their mind about the problem.

  • AngelicaL-ilc
    8/28/2018 - 06:12 p.m.

    Digitizing images gives direct access to everyone to know part of their own history, the history of a country, its people, its principles and values.

  • Sophiab-eic
    10/22/2018 - 03:23 p.m.

    People can learn from the images. They can access into history.

  • laneyA-dec
    11/15/2018 - 08:04 a.m.

    I think digitizing images could help the public. They can help the public because so they can see what the images look like. Also so they can see how the difference between pictures now and back then. This is why I think this could help the public.

  • AthenaY-dec
    11/15/2018 - 08:06 a.m.

    I think digitizing helps the public by getting people to see what digitizing images is. It also shows what the image is and that can make someone happy if it’s a nice image.

  • DeclanC-dec
    4/08/2019 - 12:55 p.m.

    Itz was a great article.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment