Hurricane rating system fails to account for deadly rain
Hurricane rating system fails to account for deadly rain The Lumber River overflows onto a stretch Interstate 95 in Lumberton, N.C., Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2018, following flooding from Hurricane Florence. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome/AP Photo/Allen G. Breed)
Hurricane rating system fails to account for deadly rain
Lexile: 840L

Assign to Google Classroom

Meteorologists downgraded Hurricane Florence. It went from a powerful Category 4 storm to a Category 2. And then they downgraded it to a Category 1. That's when  Wayne Mills figured he could stick it out.

He regrets it. The Neuse River is normally 150 feet away. But it lapped near his door in New Bern, North Carolina. This happened last Sunday. This was even as the storm had "weakened" further.

People like Mills can be lulled into thinking a hurricane is less dangerous when the rating of a storm is reduced. But those ratings are based on wind strength. They are not based on rainfall or storm surge. Water is responsible for 90 percent of storm deaths.

The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale is 47 years old. Several meteorologists and disaster experts said something needs to change with the scale. They seek a change to reflect the real risks in hurricanes. They point to Florence. They point to last year's Hurricane Harvey and 2012's Sandy. And they point to 2008's Ike. All were storms where the official Saffir-Simpson category didn't quite convey the danger. That's because of its emphasis on wind.

"The concept of saying 'downgraded' or 'weakened should be forever banished." That's according to  Marshall Shepherd. He is a University of Georgia meteorology professor. "With Florence, I felt it was more dangerous after it was lowered to Category 2."

It was a lowered category that helped convince Famous Roberts to stay behind. He is a corrections officer from Trenton. "Like a lot of people (we) didn't think it was actually going to be as bad," he said. "With the category drop ... that's another factor why we did stay."

Once a storm hits 74 mph it is considered a Category 1 hurricane. It ratchets up until it reaches the top-of-the-scale Category 5 at 157 mph. Florence hit as a Category 1 with 90 mph winds. It was not a particularly blustery hurricane. But it has dumped nearly three feet of rain in parts of North Carolina. It dumped nearly two feet in sections of South Carolina.

"There's more to the story than the category." That's according to Brian McNoldy. He is a University of Miami hurricane researcher. "While you may still have a roof on your house because 'it's only a Category 1,' you may also be desperately hoping to get rescued from that same roof because of the flooding."

Susan Cutter is director of the Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute at the University of South Carolina. She said the hurricane center and National Weather Service "have not done a good job at communicating the risks associated with tropical systems beyond winds."

One reason, she said, is that it's much harder to explain all the other facts. Wind is easy.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says it takes all hazards seriously and it communicates them. This includes rain and storm surge. 

Forecasters were telling people four or five days before Florence hit that it would be a "major flooding event," said Bill Lapenta. He is director of NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Prediction, which includes the hurricane center.

When Florence's winds weakened and it dropped in storm category, he said, "We made it very clear that in no way shape or form that this is going to reduce the impacts in terms of flooding and surge."

Shepherd is a former president of the American Meteorological Society. He said the weather service did a great job at forecasting and made a good attempt at communicating the risk. But somehow the message isn't quite getting through, he said.

It didn't to Wayne Mills. If the storm stayed a Category 4, Mills said, "I definitely would have left."

Cutter and Shepherd said the weather service needs to work with social scientists who study how people react and why. Laplenta said his agency does that regularly and will do more after Florence.

It's only going to be more necessary in the future. That’s because global warming is making hurricanes wetter and slower. This makes them drop more rain, Shepherd said.

University of Alabama's Jason Senkbeil studies the intersection of meteorology and social science. He is working on two different new hurricane scales using letters. They will describe danger or potential damage. Florence would be an "Rs" for rainfall and storm surge.

The trouble, said Senkbeil, is "rainfall just doesn't sound threatening."

But Famous Roberts now knows it is: "I would say for everybody to take heed. And don't take anything for granted."

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 260 times
Why was rating system misleading?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • Emma B-rud
    10/10/2018 - 11:44 a.m.


    According to the text,the rating system was misleading because the hurricane kept on dropping categories. The hurricane started at four and dropped down to three and two and then one.

  • jkepn-wim4
    10/12/2018 - 12:02 p.m.

    It was misleading because it only counted the storms rating by the wind speed, not the amount of rainfall and water.

  • druss-wim5
    10/12/2018 - 12:58 p.m.

    i'm sorry for who ever lost there homes in this storm.also i'm glad i live in a area where there are no hurricans.

  • abroc-wim5
    10/12/2018 - 01:00 p.m.

    I feel so bad for everyone that was in any hurricanes! I do agree with the fact that water from hurricanes are more dangerous then the wind. 90 percent of deaths from hurricanes are from water and 10 percent are from wind. I also think that we should stop downgrading storms because we aren't mother nature and don't know for sure the dangers of the storm. If any of you all who are reading this are in the hurricane, please get out of Florida and stay safe!

  • Makennad-eic1
    10/15/2018 - 11:30 a.m.

    the reason it was misleading was that the rating system was only based on wind, not rain. so the winds couldn't be that bad yet you'd still have terrible flooding at the same time.

  • Alaysheunb-eic
    10/15/2018 - 01:51 p.m.

    It was really bad deystord most roads and houses Im glad that I leave were I leave.

  • Ryanh-eic
    10/15/2018 - 03:12 p.m.

    they need to get everyone out then get them food water and shelter in the next couple of hours

  • nathanm-orv
    10/16/2018 - 11:42 a.m.

    I am happy dont live in a place where it gets hurricanes. the floods can destroy entire towns.

  • CassidyW-dec
    10/18/2018 - 09:53 a.m.

    Hurricanes are scary. I have never been in one and I never want to be in one.

  • Jaedav-eic
    10/22/2018 - 10:48 a.m.

    Some of this article was about how they only focus on the wind rating.I think that they should focus on the wind rating as well as the rain rating.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment