How centuries-old dice reveal changing attitudes about fate
How centuries-old dice reveal changing attitudes about fate A tessera or a Roman six-sided die from the Vidy Roman Museum. (Rama/Wikimedia Commons/yoppy/Flickr)
How centuries-old dice reveal changing attitudes about fate
Lexile: 900L

Assign to Google Classroom

There are many games that rely on dice. Those games include Yahtzee and backgammon. It also includes several other games. We expect that these dice will be “fair.” We expect each is as likely to land on any of their six sides. But probability wasn’t always a concern when it came to the roll of the dice. That's according to Michelle Starr reporting for Science Daily. A study analyzed dice dating from the Roman era to the 17th century. It found that the universal little cubes have become increasingly uniform over time. And they have become increasingly fair. 

Researchers studied 110 dice. They came from museums and archaeological depots in the Netherlands. The researchers were from the University of California, Davis and the American Museum of Natural History. 

They compared the 110 dice to 62 dice from the United Kingdom. They described this intriguing evolution of dice over the centuries in the study. It was published in the journal Acta Archaeologica.

The researchers found that dice made before 400 B.C., or during the Roman era, were large. These dice typically adhered to the “sevens” configuration. 

In the "sevens" configuration, opposite sides add up to the number seven (1-6, 2-5, 3-4). This is the configuration commonly used today. But unlike the symmetrical cubes that we know, Roman dice were highly irregular in shape. They were made from a variety of materials. These materials included bone and metal. It also included clay. They were often squished and lopsided. 

It is possible that ancient Romans deliberately used irregular dice because they thought it would help manipulate the roll. That's according to the researchers. But it might also be true that Romans weren’t particularly concerned about the shape of their dice. They may have believed that the outcome of a roll was determined by fate.

Researchers are certain that the Romans’ wonky dice would have affected how the dice fell. 

“The majority of the asymmetrical dice have the 1 and 6 on opposite sides of the flattened cube in positions more likely to roll ‘up.’” That's what they explained in the study.

Dice became more standardized starting in 1100 A.D. This may suggest that European gamblers became increasingly concerned about rooting out players who tried to gain an advantage with unfair dice. The cubes got smaller. This led to a change in design. Previously, a die’s “pips,” or dots, were surrounded by two rings around them. In the 12th century, there was room for only a single ring. The configuration of dice also shifted to a numbering style. It was popular in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. This saw opposing sides of a die add up to a prime number (1-2, 3-4, 5-6).

Jelmer Eerkens is an anthropologist at UC Davis and is also one of the authors of the study. He spoke to Christina Ayele Djossa of Atlas Obscura. “We don’t really have a good idea why that [change] happened or what caused that shift. But we see it both in the U.K. and the Netherlands. So, it was something people must have agreed upon.”

During the Renaissance, dice underwent yet another significant change. Starting around 1450, they became less regular in size and pip style. But they became more standardized in symmetry and configuration. This was a shift back to the “sevens” system. The increasing attention paid to symmetry in particular may have been driven by new knowledge of probability. It is a field of mathematics that blossomed during the Renaissance.

“A new worldview was emerging,” Eerkens says in a statement. “People like Galileo and Blaise Pascal were developing ideas about chance and probability, and we know from written records in some cases they were actually consulting with gamblers. We think users of dice also adopted new ideas about fairness, and chance or probability in games.”

The evolving shape of dice may seem like a niche topic. But knowing about these six-sided implements can be very useful to archaeologists and historians. For one, understanding changes in dice could help with the dating of archaeological sites, particularly if there is a scarcity of other materials that would be useful in dating.

Dice also offer insight into the transmission of knowledge throughout northwestern Europe. While ancient dice were quite irregular, later dice were standardized. This suggests that there were a small number of die manufacturers. It may also suggest that manufacturers were staying faithful to culturally transmitted rules about die production. Then, of course, the changing roll of the dice itself, suggests shifting worldviews in Europe.

“Gamblers may have seen dice throws as no longer determined by fate,” the researchers write in their study, “but instead as randomizing objects governed by chance.”

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 195 times
Do you think dice are fair? Why or why not?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • Adrian-E2
    12/03/2018 - 04:09 p.m.

    This article was about ancient people and there dice. That was an interesting article. They use to know that it was fair, but now days you don't know if it's loaded or not.(loaded dice means it had a weight on one side so it would only go on one side.)

  • BenC-E2
    12/13/2018 - 10:03 a.m.

    Interesting dice before 400 b.c. were unfair .110 were studied it found that these dice were unfair cause they have 7 sides . That made the game unfair

  • jkepn-wim4
    12/13/2018 - 11:04 a.m.

    I think dice are not fair because it is just odds. I think that fair is what you deserve based on your work. Dice are just random. For example, if someone cant decide who a killer is and they role a dice, that isn't fair to the wrongfully accused. Dice are just chance, and chance is not fair.

  • klee-wim4
    12/13/2018 - 11:08 a.m.

    I do think dice are fair. The reason I believe this because there are up to six numbers on the regular dice, and you have a chance of getting a number one out of six. The shape of the dice is a cube and if it were to be another shape it would not be fair, but because it is a cube, it has an even amount of a chance to roll.

    • saiges-ewi
      4/08/2020 - 03:03 p.m.

      I disagree because a dice is a cube with 4 sides and its a even shape. So when you roll it you have an even chance of getting a number 1-6. If it was uneven you could get that number multiple times.

    • saiges-ewi
      4/08/2020 - 03:13 p.m.

      Dice are fair because its a cube with all equal sides. Nothing is unequal. You will have a fair chance of getting any body at least once. But the dice back in the roman times are not fair due to shape and the numbers on the dice.

  • clewi-wim4
    12/13/2018 - 11:11 a.m.

    No, dice aren't really fair. It's just probability. Dice can't read your mind and land on what you want, they just land on random tiles. It's really just a game of chance, and when you roll, you get what you get.

  • cmanz-wim5
    12/13/2018 - 12:36 p.m.

    No, it is probability and fate. It is randomized and dice are just a chance or odds."“Gamblers may have seen dice throws as no longer determined by fate,” the researchers write in their study, “but instead as randomizing objects governed by chance.”"

  • MckenzieH-dec
    1/02/2019 - 10:59 a.m.

    Geese there’s a lot more to dice then I thought! Also, I can’t believe they studied 110 dice, that’s crazy!!

  • AlyssaF-dec
    1/02/2019 - 11:19 a.m.

    I was able to really rail into this article. This is because I love games and most of the ones I like are with dice. This article was interesting.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment