Assign to Google Classroom
A small drone flying low to the ground crashed onto the White House grounds. It triggered a major emergency response. And it raised fresh questions about security at the presidential mansion. A man later came forward to say he was responsible and didn't mean to fly it over the complex.
The man contacted the Secret Service after reports of the crash spread. The man told the agency that he had been flying the drone recreationally. The man is a Washington resident. He is cooperating with investigators.
Although President Barack Obama was not at home, the security breach prompted a lockdown of the entire complex. Officials first needed to examine the drone. The White House later said it did not pose a threat.
The drone crashed on the southeast side of the White House grounds. The incident occurred just after 3 a.m. Monday.
Secret Service agents are interviewing other people to corroborate the man's story. They don't currently have any reason to doubt the man's story, an official said.
The device was described as a two-foot-long quadcopter. It's a commercially available unmanned aircraft. It is lifted by four propellers. Many small quadcopters are essentially sophisticated toys. They can also be useful for commercial operations like aerial photography and inspections. Often weighing only a few pounds, they sell for as little as a few hundred dollars or less. Many were popular Christmas gifts last year.
The president and first lady Michelle Obama were traveling in India. Their daughters, Sasha and Malia, may have been at home. White House officials declined to comment on the daughters' whereabouts Monday. But ahead of the president's trip, aides had said the daughters would remain in Washington.
"The early indications are that it does not pose any sort of ongoing threat to anybody at the White House," said presidential spokesman Josh Earnest.
Still, the incident was likely to reinvigorate a long-running public debate about the use of commercial drones in U.S. skies, as well as White House security. The Secret Service is still recovering after a string of breaches. They raised questions about whether the president is adequately protected.
Inexpensive drones have prompted growing fears about potential collisions with traditional aircraft. Technological advances have also made it easier to equip drones with advanced capabilities such as cameras. That's raised privacy issues. It also raises concerns that such devices could carry weapons.
Industry experts said that to carry and fire a weapon, a drone would need more engines and more propellers than most commercially manufactured quadcopters.
Critical thinking challenge: Give two reasons why the drone did not pose a threat to the president.
Source URL: https://www.tweentribune.com/article/tween56/have-drones-gone-too-far/