Is "America’s Stonehenge" history or hooey?
Is "America’s Stonehenge" history or hooey? Marie St. Onge, left, and Carol Stevens walk through what is called America's Stonehenge, in Salem, N.H. The 1-acre grouping of rock configurations has drawn believers to say it is thousands of years old. Skeptics say the evidence suggests it was put together by a 19th century shoemaker. (AP Photo/Jim Cole)
Is "America’s Stonehenge" history or hooey?
Lexile: 900L

Assign to Google Classroom

Using the astronomical chart on a table in the covered tower, visitors aimed their gaze along worn arrows to huge, upright stones hundreds of feet away. Beyond each slab of granite, clearings stretched the eye to the horizon. It was a dazzling day in late summer in Salem, New Hampshire.
On the autumnal equinox, Sept. 23, people flocked to the woods near the Massachusetts state line. They watched the sun rise or fall over the massive chunks of granite. And they decided for themselves whether they stood amid relics of ancient history. Or if the story was pure hooey.
This is "America's Stonehenge." It is a weird, one-acre grouping of rock configurations. They are named for the mysterious formation on England's Salisbury Plain. In New Hampshire, it has drawn believers. They say it's a thousand or more years old. It also has skeptics who say the evidence suggests it was the work of a 19th century shoemaker.
For $12, visitors get to meander along well-trod footpaths. They pass through walls of stacked granite. Some are overtopped with slabs that weigh several tons to form cave-like enclosures. Two are the "Sundeck" chamber and "V-hut." The spooky centerpiece is the "Oracle" chamber. It is complete with what is billed as a secret bed. And there's a speaking tube where words spoken from inside the chamber could be heard outside at the equally eerie "Sacrificial Table."
The site was called "Mystery Hill Caves" when it opened in 1958.  Today, owner Dennis Stone firmly believes the site is as much as 4,000 years old. He believes it is the work of Native Americans or perhaps ancient Europeans who arrived long before Columbus.
"They actually did shaping to these. It's like shaping an arrowhead," Stone said in a rapid-fire voice, pointing to the giant slabs. "Stone against stone. So the technology used to take them off the bedrock and shape these stones was a stone-age technology, not a metal age technology."
Stone said three carbon dating efforts indicate the site was used about 4,000 years ago. One fire pit is 7,300 years old. (Scientists say the research proves only that there was a fire and that none of those dates is linked to human activity).
"We think the design of the site looks more like a spiritual site," Stone said. "It has a huge amount of work that went into quarrying each building. But there isn't a lot of room."
Anthropologists and archaeologists believe America's Stonehenge was more likely the homestead of shoemaker Jonathan Pattee. He settled in Salem in 1823. In his 2006 book "The Archaeology of New Hampshire: Exploring 10,000 Years in the Granite State," Plymouth State University archaeologist David Starbuck called America's Stonehenge "unquestionably provocative, puzzling and, above all, controversial."
Professor Starbuck notes the 19th century quarrying marks on many of the stones. He said the site has been altered so many times over the decades - particularly by owner and researcher William Goodwin starting in 1936 - that there will never be a way to settle the argument over its genesis.
"There is probably no serious, trained archaeologist who believes that it was created thousands of years ago," Starbuck said.
"There's a huge burden of proof when you make controversial claims," he said. "They've always had that problem. That doesn't take away from the inherent interest in that site. It is a curious place. And it is worth visiting."
Invoking Stonehenge can automatically boost interest in a place. Witness the stir caused earlier in September. Researchers announced they had discovered evidence of standing stones believed to be remnants of a major prehistoric monument two miles from Stonehenge. And then there's Carhenge: The junk-car tribute to Stonehenge that has been an attraction in the Nebraska panhandle since 1987.
Like Starbuck, Meghan Howey, an anthropological archaeologist at the University of New Hampshire, also thinks the site was a colonial dwelling. She said there are commonplace explanations for some of the more fantastic features. For example, the "Sacrificial Table" bears the same sort of drainage channels that would be found on a rock slab used to make soap. Still, she understands the desire to impart meaning where none may exist.
"People in England have an attachment to Stonehenge because it was built by their ancestors," she said. "We don't feel a connection. So we're always looking for a connection."
Pausing during a recent visit, retirees Marie St. Onge and Carol Stevens said they believe America's Stonehenge means something. Even if they aren't sure exactly what it means.
"With the caves that are dug and the way things are laid out, I would go with it 99 percent that it's original," said St. Onge.
Stone doesn't know for sure the who, when, how or why of America's Stonehenge. But he says the evidence points to something greater than skeptics believe.
"They're kind of ignorant of all the facts of the site," he said of critics. "I'm not saying they're stupid. Just that they don't know the facts."

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 123 times
What it the relationship of the New Hampshire site to Britain’s Stonehenge?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • TehyaWhite-Ste
    10/07/2015 - 11:47 a.m.

    I don't believe that America's Stonehenge is 100% original and I also don't believe that Stonehenge is 100% either. I believe that humans have a hand in most things that spectacular. That could be something that could link them.

  • dionted-
    10/09/2015 - 01:47 p.m.

    In fact last month I was reading an article on the American Stonehenge. It was truly fascinating but this give a little more incite

  • brookem-1-bar
    10/12/2015 - 01:11 p.m.

    The relationship is that New Hampshire is on the east coast of America, the direction the pilgrims came from. Settlers also settled on the east coast making it very and highly possible for settlers to settle in new hampshire. I thought it was interesting for someone to have the idea and build a cool building like this.

  • maxwellc-3-bar
    10/13/2015 - 11:33 p.m.

    The relationship of the New Hampshire site to England's Stonehenge is unclear, but it's there. Both structures are stone and have an unknown meaning. They are thousands of years old according to scientific carbon-dating tests. It is unsure if these are completely accurate, but many people continue to experiment on these landmarks. From the accounts of a scientist with experience on this topic, they said, "With the caves that are dug and the way things are laid out, [they] would go with it 99 percent that it's original." So, this rock mass might look and be just about as old as England's Stonehenge, but it is more probable to be its own, independent monument. Now the only unknown variable is the "Why."

  • mollyk-
    10/19/2015 - 08:30 p.m.

    The relationship of the New Hampshire site to Britain's stone hedge is that they are both built by their ancestors and were used for spiritual reasons.

  • aliviab-ste
    10/23/2015 - 03:41 p.m.

    These stonehenges are an important part of American history. It will lead us to one more piece of America's history prior to the discovery of the land by Columbus and further than the Native Americans kept records of.

  • irisp-ste
    9/01/2016 - 03:45 p.m.

    I do not feel that America's so-called "Stonehenge" is entirely original. Like the anthropologists and their knowledge all based on facts found at the site, I believe the rock formations were created by the shoemaker during the 19th Century. However, like the the citizens in Britain, Americans also like to have sense of curiosity about historical landmarks. A further spiritual meaning behind how the rocks were formed in both places may give some a sense of hope or wonder.

  • daltons1-ste
    9/27/2016 - 09:09 a.m.

    This is just a pile of rocks. This has no significance other than it shows someone can stack rocks in the woods. This is dumb.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment