Is "America’s Stonehenge" history or hooey?
Is "America’s Stonehenge" history or hooey? Marie St. Onge, left, and Carol Stevens walk through what is called America's Stonehenge, in Salem, N.H. The 1-acre grouping of rock configurations has drawn believers to say it is thousands of years old. Skeptics say the evidence suggests it was put together by a 19th century shoemaker. (AP Photo/Jim Cole)
Is "America’s Stonehenge" history or hooey?
Lexile: 900L

Assign to Google Classroom

Using the astronomical chart on a table in the covered tower, visitors aimed their gaze along worn arrows to huge, upright stones hundreds of feet away. Beyond each slab of granite, clearings stretched the eye to the horizon. It was a dazzling day in late summer in Salem, New Hampshire.
On the autumnal equinox, Sept. 23, people flocked to the woods near the Massachusetts state line. They watched the sun rise or fall over the massive chunks of granite. And they decided for themselves whether they stood amid relics of ancient history. Or if the story was pure hooey.
This is "America's Stonehenge." It is a weird, one-acre grouping of rock configurations. They are named for the mysterious formation on England's Salisbury Plain. In New Hampshire, it has drawn believers. They say it's a thousand or more years old. It also has skeptics who say the evidence suggests it was the work of a 19th century shoemaker.
For $12, visitors get to meander along well-trod footpaths. They pass through walls of stacked granite. Some are overtopped with slabs that weigh several tons to form cave-like enclosures. Two are the "Sundeck" chamber and "V-hut." The spooky centerpiece is the "Oracle" chamber. It is complete with what is billed as a secret bed. And there's a speaking tube where words spoken from inside the chamber could be heard outside at the equally eerie "Sacrificial Table."
The site was called "Mystery Hill Caves" when it opened in 1958.  Today, owner Dennis Stone firmly believes the site is as much as 4,000 years old. He believes it is the work of Native Americans or perhaps ancient Europeans who arrived long before Columbus.
"They actually did shaping to these. It's like shaping an arrowhead," Stone said in a rapid-fire voice, pointing to the giant slabs. "Stone against stone. So the technology used to take them off the bedrock and shape these stones was a stone-age technology, not a metal age technology."
Stone said three carbon dating efforts indicate the site was used about 4,000 years ago. One fire pit is 7,300 years old. (Scientists say the research proves only that there was a fire and that none of those dates is linked to human activity).
"We think the design of the site looks more like a spiritual site," Stone said. "It has a huge amount of work that went into quarrying each building. But there isn't a lot of room."
Anthropologists and archaeologists believe America's Stonehenge was more likely the homestead of shoemaker Jonathan Pattee. He settled in Salem in 1823. In his 2006 book "The Archaeology of New Hampshire: Exploring 10,000 Years in the Granite State," Plymouth State University archaeologist David Starbuck called America's Stonehenge "unquestionably provocative, puzzling and, above all, controversial."
Professor Starbuck notes the 19th century quarrying marks on many of the stones. He said the site has been altered so many times over the decades - particularly by owner and researcher William Goodwin starting in 1936 - that there will never be a way to settle the argument over its genesis.
"There is probably no serious, trained archaeologist who believes that it was created thousands of years ago," Starbuck said.
"There's a huge burden of proof when you make controversial claims," he said. "They've always had that problem. That doesn't take away from the inherent interest in that site. It is a curious place. And it is worth visiting."
Invoking Stonehenge can automatically boost interest in a place. Witness the stir caused earlier in September. Researchers announced they had discovered evidence of standing stones believed to be remnants of a major prehistoric monument two miles from Stonehenge. And then there's Carhenge: The junk-car tribute to Stonehenge that has been an attraction in the Nebraska panhandle since 1987.
Like Starbuck, Meghan Howey, an anthropological archaeologist at the University of New Hampshire, also thinks the site was a colonial dwelling. She said there are commonplace explanations for some of the more fantastic features. For example, the "Sacrificial Table" bears the same sort of drainage channels that would be found on a rock slab used to make soap. Still, she understands the desire to impart meaning where none may exist.
"People in England have an attachment to Stonehenge because it was built by their ancestors," she said. "We don't feel a connection. So we're always looking for a connection."
Pausing during a recent visit, retirees Marie St. Onge and Carol Stevens said they believe America's Stonehenge means something. Even if they aren't sure exactly what it means.
"With the caves that are dug and the way things are laid out, I would go with it 99 percent that it's original," said St. Onge.
Stone doesn't know for sure the who, when, how or why of America's Stonehenge. But he says the evidence points to something greater than skeptics believe.
"They're kind of ignorant of all the facts of the site," he said of critics. "I'm not saying they're stupid. Just that they don't know the facts."

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 123 times
What it the relationship of the New Hampshire site to Britain’s Stonehenge?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • madisonm5-sch
    9/29/2015 - 08:59 a.m.

    The relationship of the New Hampshire site to Britain's Stonehenge is people's ancestors from England built the Stonehenge they believe.

  • alessiam-sch
    9/29/2015 - 08:59 a.m.

    The relationship between New Hampshire's site to Britain's Stonehenge is they are both thousands of years old and all of the rocks that are caves. Both sites are from ancestors.

  • aidand1-sch
    9/29/2015 - 08:59 a.m.

    Both are over 1000 years old. They are also both named for the mysterious formation on England's Salisbury plain.

  • nathanielr-sch
    9/29/2015 - 08:59 a.m.

    Well the relationship of the new hampshire site to the britain's stonehenge it is old

  • andrewl2-sch
    9/29/2015 - 09:00 a.m.

    the relationship of the new hampshire site to britain's stonehenge is that they are both made of granite and that they are a landform of new hampshire and britain.

  • bachl-sch
    9/29/2015 - 09:00 a.m.

    The difference between New Hampshire and Britain is that they were both made at least thousands of years ago. Scientists agreed that both stonehenges were used for spiritual reasons.

  • GigiSylvester-Ste
    10/01/2015 - 01:14 p.m.

    I never knew about the history of this. The connection is hat they were both built by their ancestors.

  • sierrab-ste
    10/06/2015 - 12:44 p.m.

    I've never heard about this Stonehenge structure and it actually sounds pretty cool. I'd like to go see it and walk through it. It's also pretty neat that there is still a mystery to the place, that just makes me want to go there even more.

  • ShawnaWeiser-Ste
    10/06/2015 - 07:53 p.m.

    I don't understand why they can't mark a date for the building of the " American Stonehenge". Scientists can figure almost everything out no a days with their technology. Anyhow, I do like that it can accessible to the public.

  • melissaj-Ste
    10/06/2015 - 09:16 p.m.

    In the early dawning of America, the Puritans crossed the "pond" from Britain to present-day New England. It just boggles me how professional and highly trained archaeologists could get an Englishman's work confused with Native American workings. Honestly, I wouldn't completely surprised to find out the "American Stonehenge" is a fraud. You would think America is a little bit more ingenious enough to come up with their own name instead of "American Stonehenge" after the Stonehenge in England.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment