We thought we’d be living in space (or under giant domes) by now
We thought we’d be living in space (or under giant domes) by now A proposed space colony designed by NASA researchers in the 1970s. (NASA Ames Research Center/Courtesy Bigelow Aerospace)
We thought we’d be living in space (or under giant domes) by now
Lexile: 1340L

Assign to Google Classroom

The International Space Station is known for a distinct lack of personal space, with crews packed into phone booth-sized beds and assaulted by continuous light, sound and surveillance. But if things go right during a SpaceX resupply mission this spring, the station could soon be a bit roomier and more relaxing.
After the Dragon capsule reaches the station, the ISS's robot arm will pull out a device called the Bigelow Aerospace Expandable Activity Module, or BEAM -- and the future of housing might just change forever.
The 13-foot-long module is being referred to by Bigelow Aerospace and NASA as an "expandable habitat," but to the average viewer it will look more like a big white balloon. Think of it as a kind of spare room, one that cost NASA a cool $17.8 million. BEAM will arrive uninflated, but once it's attached to one of the station's nodes it will blow up, creating a new -- if not entirely expansive -- section of the ISS.
"I jokingly refer to it as a largish New York apartment," says Mike Gold, director of D.C. operations and business growth for Bigelow Aerospace. BEAM isn't intended to be used as living quarters, he notes. Rather, it will serve as a proof of concept for expandable habitats.
Gold sees another benefit to the module: a bit of peace and quiet. "Acoustically, it's going to be the quietest location aboard the International Space Station," he says. Will astronauts use it as a respite from the always-on environment of the bigger station? Right now, it's unclear. In a release, NASA says only that the station will be measured and tested over time. But Gold thinks the module has the potential as a place for science experiments, stowage and other activities. After all, the concept has been tested before: In 2006 and 2007, the company launched the Genesis I and II missions, when expandable habitats headed into orbit via converted Russian ICBMs.
The limited plans for the habitat are a far cry from the "space hotel" label that has long been associated with the company. Bigelow Aerospace is owned by hotelier and real estate mogul Robert Bigelow, whose plans to take his empire to space have been the source of speculation and sometimes mockery since he launched the company in 1998.
That moniker irritates Gold, who calls it a "pernicious misconception." He says that tourism is just a portion of the company's long-term plan. The term has been in use since the module that inspired Bigelow Aerospace's current projects, a NASA-designed inflatable crew quarters project known as TransHab.
TransHab turned out to be just a pipe dream.  The project's funding was cut in 2000 and it literally never left the ground. Bigelow snatched up NASA's patent rights and used them to develop the technology.
If BEAM isn't a space hotel, the company's next project sure seems like one. Now that BEAM is ready to deploy, the company is perfecting the B330, an even larger expandable habitat that could be used for housing, research and development or astronaut training.
Unlike BEAM, the B330, named for its 330 cubic meters of internal space, is a completely independent module.  It doesn't need to hook up to the International Space Station, and it can support a crew of up to six. B330s can even be hooked up to one another to form free-floating commercial stations like Alpha Station, a proposed space station that Bigelow Aerospace claims could help nations develop their astronaut corps, perfect space travel and conduct research.
On its website, the company says it will offer things like one-off astronaut flights ($26.75 million to $36.75 million per seat), leased space station space ($25 million for exclusive use of a school bus-sized space over a two-month period) and naming rights to Alpha Station ($25 million a year). Gold downplays the idea of space tourism, but doesn't discount it entirely. Perhaps it will be more lucrative, and realistic, once the company's ambitious Olympus project, named for its godly 2,100 cubic meters of space, is complete.
There are still challenges to be addressed. Right now, the company relies on commercial resupply missions to the space station launched by companies like SpaceX to get its smaller modules into orbit. But commercial rockets are small, and many don't have enough power to launch the 20-ton B330. Bigelow notes that it designed that unit to fly on an Atlas V rocket, a dependable vehicle that has a launch capacity of just over 40,000 pounds. To get its more ambitious habitats off the ground, Bigelow Aerospace will probably need a rocket like NASA's upcoming Space Launch System, or SLS, which will have an eventual lift capacity of 286,000 pounds.
Are expandable space stations (hotels or otherwise) the buildings of the future? Perhaps. Some people may ditch the idea of space tourism and become full-time space residents in structures like Bigelow's Olympus. Some may flee Earth due to overpopulation (there's an 80 percent probability that the world's population will grow to around 11 billion by the end of this century, and there are no signs of slowing).
And then there's the cool factor -- some people may find that they simply prefer to live in microgravity surrounded by spectacular views of planets and stars all the time.
But commercial space projects are susceptible to funding issues, delays and development traffic jams, all of which could send the most optimistic predictions for the future of travel and housing tumbling back to Earth. And for every futuristic habitat success, there are scores of stalled or vastly altered projects.
What do you think the future of living in space will look like?

Source URL: https://www.tweentribune.com/article/teen/we-thought-wed-be-living-space-or-under-giant-domes-now/

Filed Under:  
Assigned 142 times
Why does the International Space Station lack personal space?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • mylesh-rob
    4/07/2016 - 10:05 a.m.

    I think it the ISS lacks space because it has to be kept small to be efficient. Think about it, if you had go across a house sized area in an environment with no gravity, it would be a pain, right? But you can't forget new recruits either, they get sick from moving too much when they first go into space. This situation would be comparable to trying to rush across your house while you're dizzy, on verge of puking and you can only moving if you propel yourself off of something else.

  • TehyaWhite-Ste
    4/12/2016 - 12:11 p.m.

    The International Space Station lacks personal space because when it sends Astronauts into space, there is a bunch of crammed into one little area and there is no way they can get away from each other.

  • briannec-ste
    4/13/2016 - 02:09 p.m.

    I would love to go up into space because of the no gravity, but I would be to scared that something would happen while I'm up there.

  • julianc-bag
    4/14/2016 - 09:07 p.m.

    The international space station lacks personal space because of the the little sleeping quarters and also the little room inside.

  • holdeno-3-bar
    4/15/2016 - 03:34 p.m.

    The ISS lacks personal space because most of the space is dedicated to science experiments. When talking about the ISS, the author says that "crews [are] packed into phone booth-sized beds and assaulted by continuous light, sound and surveillance" (par. 1) The living space for astronauts is very small. Originally, the ISS was dedicated to research and experiments. Therefore, NASA had to cut back on living space.
    I liked this article because it talked about making space more livable.

  • nickp1-lam
    4/19/2016 - 10:47 a.m.

    It would be cool to live in space, but if I can not get any peace and quiet, then what's the point. I have a hard to sleeping here on Earth. I don't think it would be any better in space. And I really like living on dry ground.

  • shaer-lam
    4/19/2016 - 02:34 p.m.

    The International Space Station lacks space because maybe the oxygen would be less dense in a large area, or they don't have enough funds to add on more space. I honestly don't think it would be too fun living in space though because I have a great fear of heights, so not being able to touch the ground again for an extended period of time would push me past my limit. Also, being in that small space for a long time would freak me out.

  • kolbyd-fel
    5/16/2016 - 02:15 p.m.

    The ISS has such a lack of space because it needs to be small to be efficient.

  • calaabj-fel
    5/16/2016 - 02:16 p.m.

    It lacks personal space because the crews are packed into phone booth sized beds ans assalted by continuous light and sound and surveillance.

  • ethanw-fel
    5/16/2016 - 02:17 p.m.

    The International Space Station lacks personal space because BEAM isn't intended to be used as living quarters, he notes. Rather, it will serve as a proof of concept for expandable habitats.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment