NFL returning to LA Fans hold up a signs commenting on the possible move by the San Diego Chargers during an NFL football game against the Miami Dolphins Sunday, Dec. 20, 2015, in San Diego. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy)
NFL returning to LA
Lexile

The San Diego Chargers, Oakland Raiders and St. Louis Rams have filed for relocation to the Los Angeles area, trying not to be left out in the race to return the NFL to the nation's second-largest market after a 21-year absence.
 
The Chargers want to partner with the AFC West rival Raiders on a stadium in Carson.
 
Chargers chairman Dean Spanos has had the right to leave San Diego since 2008, but the team's long, contentious efforts to replace aging Qualcomm Stadium became more aggressive after Rams owner Stan Kroenke announced plans to build a stadium in Inglewood.
 
The NFL confirmed it received the applications to move for the 2016 season. They will be reviewed by league staff and three committees of owners. All owners will meet in Houston during the week of Jan. 10 and are expected to vote on whether to allow any of the teams to move. A team wanting to move needs 24 of 32 votes.
 
Los Angeles has been without the NFL since after the 1994 season, when the Raiders moved back to Oakland and the Rams moved to St. Louis. The Rams had been in the L.A. area since 1946.
 
The Chargers and the city of San Diego have been at odds since 2000, when team owner Alex Spanos said the team needed a new stadium. That was just three years after the stadium was expanded to accommodate the Chargers and Super Bowls.
 
The stadium saga turned nasty this year as Mark Fabiani, an attorney for Dean Spanos, attacked Mayor Kevin Faulconer and his proposals to keep the team.
 
In a video posted on the team's web site, Dean Spanos blamed "the inability of the city at the political level to get any kind of public funding or any kind of vote to help subsidize a stadium."
 
The Chargers walked away from negotiations with the city and county in mid-June.
 
In the three brief negotiating sessions between the Chargers and city and county officials, the team mostly focused on what it called a flawed environmental impact report for a new stadium. The team did not negotiate finances, but it has said in the past that it expects a public contribution of at least 60 percent.
 
Under the city and county's proposal, public funding would be capped at 32 percent, with the team being responsible for overruns.
 
The Chargers claim 25 percent of their fan base comes from north of San Diego County, although they've declined to offer proof.
 
Oakland has expressed interest in building a stadium for the Raiders at the Coliseum site but has no funding plan as of yet.
 
The Rams currently have a year-to-year lease with the Edward Jones Dome.
 
Kroenke has ignored efforts by a St. Louis task force that is proposing a $1.1 billion stadium along the Mississippi River, not far from the Rams' current stadium, which was built in 1995.
 
Rams coach Jeff Fisher was head coach of the Houston Oilers when they relocated to Tennessee in 1996, and that could happen again.
 
"I shared with the team today, I've been through this experience before," Fisher said Jan. 4. "We have to take the approach and with the assumption that everything's taking place here in St. Louis until we're told otherwise."
 
Middle linebacker James Laurinaitis of the Rams said the demands of the season kept a possible move of the team from being too big of a distraction.
 
"Really, it'll become a big distraction now as you sit with nothing to do and you realize it's what, two weeks or not even (that) away from the decision," Laurinaitis said. "Everyone's just kind of fatigued about it, to be honest. Everyone wants closure to it all, just wants to know one way or another."

Filed Under:  
Assigned 33 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
Which team has the best chance of relocating to LA, and why?
Write your answers in the comments section below


COMMENTS (33)
  • keshayw-
    1/08/2016 - 08:46 a.m.

    that's a good idea to have them vote on whether to allow any of the teams to move.

  • rowens-cel
    1/11/2016 - 10:08 a.m.

    I think the Chargers have the best chance of relocating, though it saddens me that they will be leaving San Diego. They have been considering moving for the longest, and though many of their fans are upset, they will most likely move.

  • adamb-lam
    2/03/2016 - 09:50 a.m.

    I think that the team that has the best chance of relocating to LA are the Chargers, because they have been offered a spot to join the Rams in LA.

  • ethanw-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:16 p.m.

    The team that has the best chance to moving to L.A is the st. louis Rams.

  • lucasp-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:18 p.m.

    think that the team that has the best chance of relocating to LA are the Chargers, because they have been offered a spot to join the Rams in LA.

  • coled-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:21 p.m.

    CTQ: I believe the team with the best chance of relocation is the San Diego Chargers, because they seem like they're a more popular, or in this case, bigger-fanbased team.

  • lances-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:22 p.m.

    the team that has the best chance of relocating is the chargers because they were offered a spot.

  • johnj-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:22 p.m.

    The Chargers have the best chance of relocating to LA because the Chargers have wanted to relocate the longest and have been waiting the longest.

  • mattv-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:23 p.m.

    St. Louis Rams, because it has already been decided they will relocate.

  • elizabetht-fel
    2/04/2016 - 02:24 p.m.

    The Chargers probably would have the best chance of relocating to LA because they had been planning to move for the longest. Also because they have been offered a spot to join the Rams in Los Angeles.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT