Making national parks relevant today and tomorrow
Making national parks relevant today and tomorrow Glacier National Park. At left is the Memorial Bridge in Washington (Thinkstock)
Making national parks relevant today and tomorrow
Lexile: 1350L

Assign to Google Classroom

After nearly 100 years, the National Park Service holds some of the country's most beautiful and historic places, though it also suffers from an $11 billion backlog of unfunded maintenance and a visitor base that's aging and mostly white.

With its centennial approaching in 2016, the park service is launching a campaign to raise support and court a younger, more diverse visitor base. First lady Michelle Obama and former first lady Laura Bush will co-chair the campaign, calling on Americans to "Find Your Park."

Sustaining the parks and keeping them relevant to visitors far into the future is a challenge, park officials said. Many facilities date back 50 years or more and are in danger of failing, such as a 70-year-old water pipeline at the Grand Canyon that breaks regularly and could cut off the water supply to the site, National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis said. Lodging at Glacier National Park needs a major overhaul and the nearly 100-year-old Memorial Bridge in Washington needs at least $150 million in repairs more than the agency's entire annual construction budget.

Behind the scenes, officials are seeking to expand fundraising through the National Park Foundation and bolster congressional support to improve the parks.

This is the third major campaign in the national parks' history. An outcry over deplorable park conditions in 1915 originally led to the creation of the National Park Service. In the 1950s, there were calls to close parks because of their neglected conditions. That inspired a campaign to rebuild infrastructure and invite returning World War II veterans and their families to visit parks, with the memorable slogan "See the USA in your Chevrolet."

"They came in droves, and in the back seat of that station wagon in the national parks were today's boomer generation," Jarvis said. "They are our base today... The question that we're facing is who's going to be the next generation of park supporters."

While the national parks counted 292 million visitors in 2014, those visitors tend to be older and whiter than the U.S. population overall.

"If we were a business and that was our clientele, then over the long term, we would probably be out of business," Jarvis said.

In studying public perceptions, park officials found many people think national parks are only in the West places such as Yellowstone and Yosemite. They want people to understand that urban sites such as the Statue of Liberty, Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Little Rock, Ark., Central High School and the Lincoln Memorial in Washington are also national parks.

Over the next year, an advertising campaign will show how people connect with their favorite parks. Corporate sponsors including American Express, REI and Humana also are supporting the effort with co-branded marketing.

To broaden access to the parks, all fourth grade students and their families will get free admission to national parks during the next school year.

Celebrities including the science guy Bill Nye, actresses Bella Thorne and Roselyn Sanchez, E! News anchor Terrence J. and singer Mary Lambert are urging millennials to put down their smartphones for time in parks.

President Barack Obama requested an increase of $432 million to support the National Park Service in his 2016 budget proposal. It's a sustained request that would lift the agency's budget to $3 billion annually to address deferred maintenance and other needs but likely will face resistance in Congress.

During a recent hearing, Republican Rep. Tom McClintock of California said Congress must ensure the parks are well maintained. But he said the park service is plagued by "a clash of visions" between open access and new policies limiting access or amenities in some areas. He said the agency should be cautious about naming new parks before it fixes the ones it already has.

A campaign is under way to raise hundreds of millions of dollars to rebuild historic infrastructure with private funds. Campaign planners hope public support will also help build congressional support.

"If we don't reach out and become relevant to a broader population, we won't have the support the parks need to do their jobs in the future," said Interior Secretary Sally Jewell.

Critical thinking challenge: Why have supporters focused their efforts on seeking funds from private and corporate sponsors, rather than Congress?

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 33 times

  • ShaniaWentz-Ste
    4/17/2015 - 01:28 p.m.

    National parks are the reason that America is beautiful. Not only are they a fun place to hike in and visit, but they are also gorgeous spots to have pictures taken and to have parties. National parks are amazing in multiple ways.

  • TaylorSeifert-Ste
    4/19/2015 - 08:48 p.m.

    When wonder what the distant future will be like I always imagine all these buildings and car types things hanging in mid-air without any grass or trees to be seen. Even though it would be interesting to visit a world like that, it would extremely devastating to not have any nature left. I think that technology places a major part in younger generations not visiting parks because you an look up pictures of nature that have been edited and all that fun stuff, but then when you walk outside and see a world that world less "duller" than the picture looked, the outside doesn't seem so appealing. Plus, so many things can be done online and people are just becoming lazy, sadly I know that I'm one of them.

  • jennaw-Koc
    4/19/2015 - 11:53 p.m.

    National Parks are very relevant in our time and age. We are very well put together and decent as a country. I love our country. We are very cool human beings here. Supporters have focused on their efforts on seeking funds from private and corporate sponsors, rather than congress for numerous reasons.

  • shannons-Koc
    4/20/2015 - 12:22 a.m.

    When the first national park was created congress wanted nothing to do with the parks funding. Yes, it was a national park, but the united states government didn't want to be responsible. Today, national parks have grown across the united states. There funding is relied manly on volunteering, and donations. This is why the National Park service is reaching out to other ways to raise money. Rather than putting up the same fight that has been going on for hundreds of years with Congress.

  • ShawnaWeiser-Ste
    4/24/2015 - 01:27 p.m.

    I love camping and hiking in national parks. It is absolutely breathtaking that the earth has created such a tremendous thing over millions of years. It is such a big contrast when looking at over-developed land.

  • CharismaM
    4/29/2015 - 09:44 p.m.

    Nature is such a big part of Earth's beauty. So many people don't realize it, but without nature our planet would be dull and lifeless. People nowadays need to realize that and need to spend less time indoors.

  • ToriR-pla
    9/15/2021 - 11:38 a.m.

    National parks in the US need out help. That is the call to action provided in this article, and it is one that can be aided by all Americans. The National Parks Service is now over 100 years old, and many of the buildings and structures within are nearing the same age. These structures require maintenance and assistance that can not be met within the budget of the parks. Additionally, Nation Parks leaders are hoping to gain a younger visitor base as a way to keep the parks alive. It is interesting to here a new conversation around this, as much of the younger generations are looking to help. Younger Americans can join the fight to keep parks alive simply by visiting them. Through reading the comments on this article, it is easy to see that many students see nature and parks as a necessity in our country, and we should all be engaged in the fight to keep them alive.

  • GraceL-pla
    9/15/2021 - 11:42 a.m.

    The article "Making National Parks Relevant Today and Tomorrow" by Brett Zongker, details the challenges that face national parks as they have progressed into today. The two main areas of concern seem to be related to the visitor demographic and the park's upkeep. Many of these national parks lack the budget needed to maintain the standard expected of these landmarks, and needed updates often fall behind as a result. Additionally, the largest demographic of visitors to national parks are older and white, a population that is shrinking in the US, creating further concerns on funding. For me, I was shocked to find that the national parks are struggling. It has been a lifelong dream to visit a park on the West Coast, and the notion that interest is declining shocks me. Politicians are working towards making beneficial changes for these staples of American tourism, but it is proving to fall short. Personally, I plan to encourage more people in my age demographic to visit national parks, as was shown in the 1950's campaign, those who visit once are more likely to come back.

  • AndrewH-pla1
    9/15/2021 - 11:24 p.m.

    This article details a problem with today's national parks. Since park visitors tend to be an old and small demographic, modern-day park organizations have been struggling to expand their parks to greater audiences and to make them more relevant. Additionally, many old historic parks have been degenerating as time passes, with several of them in need of reconstruction. The money needed to fund these fixes far exceeds the budget given to these parks. In the modern era, parks have reached out to the public in order to try and find sponsorship rather than relying on Congress to maintain the quality of their parks. The idea of keeping parks organized and in shape, I think is an important example of civic engagement. National Parks are a historic treasure and playing your part as an individual to help keep them open is a great contribution to the nation's community and furthermore a great contribution to the ecological and environmental health of the country.

  • LindseyJ-pla
    10/20/2021 - 11:16 a.m.

    With the goal of increasing the visits to national parks, this really demonstrates civic engagement because National Parks have been around for a long time, but recently not too many people have been going to them. Some even say that we shouldn't have them. However, this article rebels against that idea explaining the upkeep and the worth of the locations are far too important to stop funding/visiting. This act of civic engagement shows that National Parks are both beneficial to us, and the animals inhabited in them. We benefit from them by learning about our own geographical history and facts.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment