Does Apple need Beats to stay cool?
Does Apple need Beats to stay cool? Beats Audio equipment is arranged next to an Apple laptop at Best Buy in Boston
Does Apple need Beats to stay cool?
Lexile: 1430L

Assign to Google Classroom

Beats Electronics' colorful, oversized headphones serve as a fashion accessory to cool kids riding the New York City subway, but as tech companies such as Apple, Samsung and others are discovering, wearable gadgets like smartwatches and Google Glass still have a long way to go to become trendy, must-have consumer items.

Apple's $3 billion purchase of Beats Electronics, by far the company's largest acquisition, is at least in part recognition that Beats founders Dr. Dre and Jimmy Iovine might be able to help Apple incorporate more style and flair into its premium technology gadgets especially a coming wave of wearable devices.

Technology companies see wearables as an important area of growth beyond smartphones and tablets, and many are slowly realizing that if they expect people to wear gadgets be they bracelets to monitor fitness activity, smartwatches to substitute smartphones or Internet-connected goggles those devices must focus as much on form as function.

So far, the most noteworthy wearables have hardly been stylish. The standard Google Glass product looks more like something out of Star Trek than a fashion accessory. Fitness bands meant to be worn 24 hours a day are difficult to match with evening gowns or even a suit and tie.

"I guess they are accessories, but I would not say they are high fashion," says Alison Minton, a blogger who writes about accessories, jewelry and handbags on "There's a ways to go before they could be considered high fashion in the way Chanel would be, or Prada."

To change that, tech companies are beginning to attract top talent from the world of fashion. Apple's move comes less than a year after the iPhone and iPad inventor hired Angela Ahrendts, a respected executive who helped mold Burberry into the popular luxury brand it is today. In recent weeks, Google lured fashion and marketing executive Ivy Ross, who's worked for Calvin Klein, the Gap and Coach, to head its Google Glass unit.

"With your help, I look forward to answering the seemingly simple, but truly audacious questions Glass poses: Can technology be something that frees us up and keeps us in the moment, rather than taking us out of it? Can it help us look up and out at the world around us, and the people who share it with us?" wrote Rossin a Google Plus post.

For Ahrendts, Apple is already a luxury brand. Three years before she was hired at Apple last fall, she signaled her admiration for Apple in an interview with the Wall Street Journal.

"I don't look at Gucci or Chanel or anyone," Ahrendts told the newspaper in 2010. "If I look to any company as a model, it's Apple. They're a brilliant design company working to create a lifestyle, and that's the way I see us."

To be sure, Apple has long been a trendsetter when it comes to producing elegant gadgets. Jony Ive, who designed the iPod, iPhone, iPad and Apple's newest mobile software system iOS7, still serves as the company's chief style visionary. But Dr. Dre and Iovine have created wildly popular headphones that young hipsters, celebrities and professional athletes adorn themselves with even when they're not listening to music. Dre and Iovine's input will be highly valued as Apple looks to introduce its next breakthrough device.

The cultural coming-together of geeks and fashionistas is happening slowly, says Michael Londrigan, dean of academic affairs at LIM College, a fashion school in New York City. Apple's hiring of Ahrendts, he adds, "was really the start of it."

"Overall, the goal is to marry the function with the fashion, creating a wearable technology that is sort of seamless."

Indeed, the bulky nature of many wearable gadgets is what stops many people from considering them, says Minton. To her, fitness bands are reminiscent of "gigantic, oversized watches they had when I was a kid." You know, the ones with the calculator built in.

"It doesn't look like something an adult would really wear. It's functional, but when you care about fashion it's not always about function, it's more about the look," she says.

Besides the need for sleek, unobtrusive design that can be worn with a T-shirt as well as with a three-piece suit, wearable technology also faces a material challenge.

"Fitness bands are basically rubber. That's hard to appeal to fashionistas," Minton says. "That's not really a sexy kind of material."

So what's going to nudge tech companies further into the fashion world? Minton suggests partnering with well-established fashion houses such as Stella McCartney or, yes, Burberry, on limited edition collections.

"You may not need a fitness band, but if it is in Burberry plaid, you would wear it," she says. Especially if only 1,000 are made.

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 16 times

    6/02/2014 - 03:41 p.m.

    IT unbelievable how apple and beats are working together apple and beats will now always be one of the best mac and headphone ever apple and beats are the future.

  • Angiered1
    6/02/2014 - 05:24 p.m.

    Well I'm not really sure how apple buying Beats by Dre for 3 billion dollars has much to do with fashion. But it is a ridiculous amount of money and an interesting thing to know. I also agree with what most of this article has to say. I'm not so sure I would buy something that looks like it came out of a star trek movie. (Even though Star Trek is amazing.) The article is telling the truth and I found interesting that they didn't try to make the technology more fashionable before they released it.

    6/02/2014 - 08:16 p.m.

    I don't think Beats need Apple products to be known. I have a pair of Beats Studio myself and I just thought they were cool so I bought them. Beats does good with the advertising they have. No Apple products needed.

    6/02/2014 - 11:33 p.m.

    This is a seemingly important step in Apple's rise into the "fashion industry". Beats are continuing to become a more common accessory for the young and trendy. They are becoming an increasingly popular part of people's wardrobes. As for beats becoming a high fashion item, it can be done, other brands, such as "Frends" have had their headphones featured on runways, even during fashion week. Overall this was most likely an extremely smart purchase on apple's part.

  • 2AndrewB
    6/03/2014 - 12:39 p.m.

    Does Apple need beats? No, they could have kept their 3 billion and made their own headphones. Anyone will buy apple no matter how good the product. Many people including myself do not think apple has amazing products compared to samsung, but everyone is hooked on them. There are some good points on this. Beats and Apple are the same type of company. Expensive! And also not the best quality. Beats look good and everyone has them making them look better so even more people buy them. I don't no how this will go but i don't feel like buying 800$ beats!

  • 9EmalieM
    6/03/2014 - 06:23 p.m.

    In my opinion Apple doesn't need Beats to stay cool or popular. Apple is already a great company and they would stay popular without Beats. Also Apple is very mainstream and everybody wants iPhones, iPods, and iPads and I don't think that will change with or without Beats.

  • MarissaColvin
    6/04/2014 - 08:40 a.m.

    I think that this is good for Apple because Beats are top-selling in the headphone industry. They will most likely to become successful in the future and I hope them the best of luck.

  • KH20deus
    6/04/2014 - 08:43 a.m.

    Apple definitely needs beats because if they dont there gonna have to rely on the sales of the ipads, and iphones further more as of right now PC and consoles are blowing their laptops out the water.

  • 2JacobA
    6/04/2014 - 09:57 a.m.

    I think its a good thing for apple to buy the company. They need to regain there edge over rival companies and this might be the ticket. Beats are already very popular and with apple owning the company and possibly making changes and revisions to the already very trendy headphones this could become very popular. Adding more technology and making the blue tooth better on the wireless beats would be somethings apple should try. this is great.

  • KevinR-ZDE
    6/04/2014 - 12:01 p.m.

    I hadn't really thought about the contents of this article until I actually read it. What it says makes a lot of sense. No one wants to wear a bulky, obtuse watch when they could wear a sleek, unobtrusive watch. It sounds like a good idea. Keep up the good work Apple.

Leave a comment
Leave a comment