Where have all the seabirds gone? A tufted puffin on Prince William Sound, Alaska. At left, a pair of murrs sit on the cliff on St. Paul Island, Alaska (AP photos)
Where have all the seabirds gone?
Lexile

The number of seabirds, including gulls, puffins and auklets, has dropped significantly in the Gulf of Alaska and northeast Bering Sea. It is a possible consequence of warmer waters. That is according to a preliminary federal analysis. The data includes nearly 40 years of surveys.

U.S. Geological Survey experts found the seabird population density declined 2 percent annually. This was between 1975 and 2012. The decline occurred in the northeast North Pacific. That's according to John Piatt. He is a research wildlife biologist at the USGS Alaska Science Center.

"Biologically speaking, that's a pretty major change," he said.

Piatt and researcher Gary Drew suspect the decline may be tied to less food availability. It's a consequence of warmer ocean temperatures. They occur in cycles over decades. A decade is 10 years.

Seabird populations could bounce back as water cools, Piatt said. But 10-year cycles could ultimately be superseded by global warming.

"That's what a lot of people are concerned about," he said. "We don't know."

The analysis of seabird surveys began in earnest in 1989.

"We started pulling together some of these data bases after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. It was clear we needed to get a better handle on densities of birds at sea to assess damages," Piatt said.

The result was the creation of the North Pacific Pelagic Seabird Database. It includes bird counts from 350,000 ship transects. Those are the plotted paths to systematically make measurements.

To make sense of the numbers, researchers looked for blocks of water where at least 10 surveys had been conducted in a given year. The surveys also had to be over all four decades.

"We pulled out places where there was repetition. It gave us 72 blocks of water for which we had data spanning 40 years," Piatt said.

Exxon Valdez oil killed a lot of birds, Piatt said. But seabird numbers also declined outside the spill area.

"It was much bigger than the oil spill," Piatt said.

Starting in the late 1970s, atmospheric circulation changed. Water temperatures that had been colder than average for a decade shifted. It was several degrees warmer than average for more than 30 years.

The changes were tied to effects from Pacific Decadal Oscillations. The term describes climate variability. It was coined by fisheries scientist Steven Hare. He researched connections between Alaska salmon production cycles and Pacific climate. NASA describes the oscillations as long-term ocean fluctuations. They wax and wane every 20 to 30 years.

With warmer water, phytoplankton bloomed earlier. Zooplankton fed on phytoplankton and developed earlier. They provided abundant food for early spawning fish such as halibut, pollock and cod. That left less food for late spawners. Those include capelin. It's a type of smelt consumed by seabirds.

"This was a magnitude-9 earthquake in the ecosystem," Piatt said. "Everything changed afterward, including marine birds."

Counts at bird colonies were not part of the USGS review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seabird researcher David Irons said trends at colonies are generally in sync with the at-sea data. Seabird numbers fell at some colonies in the mid-1980s and afterward. But they eventually leveled off or increased.

"Basically the decline leveled off around 2000," Irons said.

The USGS review goes through 2012. As water temperatures have cooled in recent years, some bird numbers have ticked up, Piatt said. The historical record indicates wildlife such as salmon has booms and busts in population. They correspond to natural cycles in the environment.

"The animals are responsive to changes in the environment," he said.

The more worrisome issue is global warming that could supersede decadal, or 10-year, pulses.

"The background increase in global temperature is a happening fact," he said. "It's not hypothetical."

Critical thinking challenge: How did warmer water lead to fewer birds?

Assigned 22 times


COMMENTS (4)
  • John0724-YYCA
    4/03/2015 - 02:24 p.m.

    This is a bad news because if the population of seabirds, including gulls, puffins and auklets, has dropped significantly in the Gulf of Alaska and northeast Bering Sea than this could lead to existence which probably not be good because I love penguins. So now we know why the penguins are disappearing and it is all because of global warming so you people better stop smoking in Alaska or it is good bye to penguins and probably that wouldn't be good to see.

  • zoeydiek-Mag
    4/06/2015 - 11:15 a.m.

    i hope the sea birds come back and the global warming cools down but i don't think it can cause its stuck in are solar system. i hope the water cools down

  • John0724-YYCA
    7/10/2015 - 05:40 p.m.

    I think that it is bad that the birds of Alaska population is going down because mostly of there food and there was puffins inside the story and I know about why the puffins are endangered but the other sea birds were endangered too which surprised me. I think that we should do something to help them.

    • Eugene0808-YYCA
      7/29/2015 - 05:51 p.m.

      REBUTTAL:
      John, the seabirds of Alaska's population are decreasing because of food shortage. The seabirds of Alaska doesn't apply just to puffins, it counts for all the seabirds that are endangered in Alaska. We have to stop over-fishing so that there is food for the seabirds.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT