What did life on earth look like 4 billion years ago? This photo shows fossil-like rock found in Australia containing hints of life from 4.1 billion years ago. Life on a near primordial Earth may have been around 4.1 billion years ago, 300 million years earlier than thought, hints a chemical fossil-like rock found in Australia. It also gives more hope for life elsewhere in the universe. (Bruce Watson/PNAS/AP)
What did life on earth look like 4 billion years ago?

Assign to Google Classroom

Scientists have found fossil-like hints that some kind of life existed on Earth 4.1 billion years ago. Back then the planet was a mere volcanic toddler. That's 300 million years earlier for life to pop up than previously thought.
This could change the way scientists believe Earth was like soon after it formed 4.5 billion years ago.  It also gives them reason to theorize that life itself is more plentiful throughout the universe. That is because it seemed to start up so quickly.
Researchers examined tiny grains of a mineral. It is called zircon. The mineral is found in western Australia's Jack Hills. The scientists chemically dated them to when Earth was barely 400 million years old. Inside one of the grains, they found what they call a "chemo-fossil."  It is a certain mix of carbon isotopes. This is according to a study.  The study was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Think of it as "the gooey remains of biotic life or anything more complicated," said study co-author Mark Harrison. He is a UCLA geochemistry professor.
There are different types of carbon with different weights. This carbon residue had a higher percentage of the lighter type of carbon.  It's what scientists usually find in remnants of life. Think of it as the same as if your finger decayed, Harrison said. There are rare cases where this particular carbon signature wouldn't be from life. But they are exceedingly unusual. And they occur only in certain situations.
Harrison theorizes that the carbon is from a colony of tiny organisms. He said they are of some unknown type. Life existing 300 million years earlier than science thought is the most logical and simplest explanation. But "this is not smoking gun evidence," Harrison said.
The common thinking of early volcanic Earth is that it was too molten.  The belief has been that there was not enough liquid water for life to take hold this early. But, Harrison said, there's no physical evidence for this theory. What the zircon shows is "the Earth by 4.1, 4.2 billion years ago was basically behaving like it is today."
"This is what transformative science is all about," said Stephen Mojzsis. He is a University of Colorado scientist. He was not involved in the new research. "If life is responsible for these signatures, it arrives fast and early."
S. Blair Hedges of Temple University also wasn't part of the study. The professor said Harrison's findings make sense. The accelerated timeline of life fits with his own genetic tracking work.
"If life arose relatively quickly on Earth," Hedges wrote in an email, "then it could be common in the universe."

Filed Under:  
Assigned 52 times
Why does the presence of water factor into scientists thinking about life on earth?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • ethang-cur
    11/02/2015 - 11:25 a.m.

    lol # 4billion years :0 :o :)

  • nathank-lam
    11/02/2015 - 01:26 p.m.

    WOW... I didn't think something so old would still be here. I thought everything from back then would be gone.

  • griffinl1-rob
    11/03/2015 - 01:41 p.m.

    There were not enough liquid water to hold about 300 million years ago.the earth of the same as 4.1 billion years ago.

  • smalld-rob
    11/03/2015 - 01:52 p.m.

    "The belief has been that there was not enough liquid water for life to take hold this early"

  • kovacka-rob
    11/16/2015 - 01:38 p.m.

    how do they now how long earth has been her when we were not living at that time

Take the Quiz Leave a comment