Scientists learn more about the “Tully monster”
Scientists learn more about the “Tully monster” This photo provided by The Field Museum in Chicago shows a fossil of a Tully monster. (Paul Mayer/Sean McMahon/The Field Museum via AP)
Scientists learn more about the “Tully monster”
Lexile: 770L

Assign to Google Classroom

For decades, fossil hunters have searched the soil near a creek in north-central Illinois. Many have been rewarded with the preserved remnants of a prehistoric creature. Its wide-set eyes were on stalks and a long, arm-like appendage extended from below them with a pincer-like mouth.
There was no doubt that the Tully monster, Illinois' official state fossil, was "very, very bizarre."  That is according to Scott Lidgard. He is a paleontologist at Chicago's Field Museum. But no one could say exactly what the soft-bodied creature was.
That changed March 16 with a paper published in the journal Nature. A group of researchers, Lidgard included, concluded the Tully monster had a precursor to a backbone. It was a vertebrate, or primitive fish.
The origin of vertebrates is still an open question, he said. There aren't many good examples of preserved, soft-bodied fishes. It's also personally important for Lidgard. He has long been charged with the museum's collection of 1,800 Tully monster fossils. The collection is the largest in the world.
"I'm pretty excited. I've had to live with this guy, something I wish I knew what it was, for my 32 years here," he said. "And it's been a puzzle."
The fossilized remnants of the Tully monster have not been found outside Illinois. They have only been found in the Mazon Creek area. It's about 50 miles southwest of downtown Chicago. About 300 million years ago, the spot was a warm coastal marsh. It was along a long-gone sea near the equator. This was before the dinosaurs. Tyrannosaurus rex didn't come about until roughly 67 million years ago.
The abundant plant life eventually became coal. Eons later, strip mining dug up piles of earth and shale and fossilized prehistoric life. Paleontologists consider the area a treasure. That is because of plant and animal life that was, for reasons not fully known, set in stone quickly enough before decay could set in.
An amateur paleontologist named Francis Tully unearthed the first Tully monster. That was in 1958. Thousands of other examples have since been found by fossil hunters. They have combed the area. Much of the area is now set aside as Mazonia-Braidwood State Fish and Wildlife Area.
Mining faded in the 1970s. After decades of fossil hunting, the area does not yield quite as many specimens as it used to, said Colleen Schmidt. She is an office associate at the state fish and wildlife area.
But those who know where to look can still find plenty. The hunters leave with oblong nodules of rock. Some rocks, when broken open, contain fossils. Often it's plant life, like prehistoric ferns. They are hard to imagine on Illinois' prairie.
The Tully monster fossils show a creature that swam the shallows of that ancient sea. It ranged from a few inches long to roughly a foot. There are traces of other, more-familiar animals, Lidgard said, especially the odd mouth and its teeth. Those are known as stylets. They share some characteristics with squids and lampreys. The eye stalks are similar to some snails.
The team of researchers from the museum, Argonne National Laboratory, Yale University and elsewhere focused on some of the fossils' curious raised areas. Those areas were once believed to be remnants of the animal's guts. But that kind of soft tissue would have been pressed flat as it was fossilized. These areas must have been something harder, more resilient, they thought.
"It has a cartilage skeletal system," Lidgard said the group concluded. "It runs along the midline. Beneath it is the nerve cord ... sort of a precursor to a spine."
Even with the discovery, the Tully monster remains in many ways an unanswered question.
That strange mouth, extended away from its body, may have helped it as a predator, Lidgard said.  Or maybe it scavenged for food. The wide-set eyes may have given it a greater field of vision for hunting. No one knows for sure.
And Mazon Creek continues to offer more mysteries.
"There's an animal called the H animal," named for its odd, H-shaped body, Lidgard said. "We don't know what it is."

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 45 times
Why is the creature called a “monster?”
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • jamaurianr-hei
    3/23/2016 - 11:11 a.m.

    Because it can scare people

    • shanes1-hei
      3/23/2016 - 03:29 p.m.

      Jamaurian R not to be mean but I think you could add more.

  • deshawnb-hei
    3/23/2016 - 01:27 p.m.

    many people call it the monster because its is mad evil and that's why they call it the monster it is evil and could hurt someone and there life could be over.

  • shanes1-hei
    3/23/2016 - 03:26 p.m.

    one reason is that it isn't like any one have saw. another is that it has a pincher.

    • williaml-hei
      3/23/2016 - 03:55 p.m.

      i agree with your comment because you said why they called it a monster.

  • landone2-hei
    3/23/2016 - 03:30 p.m.

    They call it a monster,because it can hurt people. The other reason is because it is scary.

    • williaml-hei
      3/23/2016 - 04:00 p.m.

      I kind of agree because it dose not show it is scary but i might be able to hurt someone.

  • williaml-hei
    3/23/2016 - 03:40 p.m.

    It was called a monster because it probably looked like an monster. so that means it could look really bad.

    3/30/2016 - 12:34 p.m.

    I really liked this article,but I would like to know more about the Tully monster and the H animal.Also I think the Tully monster is called a monster because it is very odd and it looks like a monster.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment