Move over, steel: The high rises of tomorrow are "plyscrapers" Albina Yard's construction uses wood as structural elements--walls, supports and floors. (Courtesy LEVER Architecture)
Move over, steel: The high rises of tomorrow are "plyscrapers"
Lexile

Humans have been crafting shelters out of trusty wood ever since our ancestors solved the problem of chopping down trees. Wood is in everything from simple huts made of branches, to broad pavilions with large timbers set in post-holes. Wood is a material that has always featured highly in construction.
 
In Europe, there's evidence of wooden structures from at least 4000 B.C. Humans were building probably well before that. This is given that wood typically doesn't hold up well after being buried for millennia. 

The ones that are still standing today aren't mere hovels. Switzerland claims the House of Bethlehem. It dates from 1287 A.D. The famous Urnes stave church in Norway was built around 1130 A.D. And the great-grandtemple of them all is standing at 122 feet tall. It is Japan's Horyu-ji pagoda. It was built in 607 A.D.
 
But wood can only build so high. So as cities grew, builders began to use new materials. The modern skyline in many cities is almost exclusively shiny glass and polished stone. The materials are supported by steel and concrete.
 
Yet now, wood is making a comeback. It's in a new way.
 
One big boon is a material called cross-laminated timber. Architects and engineers hope it will make big buildings lighter. Buildings could become cheaper to build. They also could become more environmentally friendly. What is that material? Just call it CLT.
 
"I've been here for nearly 30 years now. And during that time there've only been a few items that have generated a bit of buzz and interest. This is one of those items," said David Kretschmann. He is a research engineer. He works with the U.S. Forest Service's Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). It is in Madison, Wisconsin.
 
CLT has been in use in Europe for nearly 20 years. 

CLT and other so-called mass timber products have been key design elements. University of British Columbia's Brock Commons 18-story building will hold the record for tallest CLT-constructed structure when it's done. 

And 18 stories is by no means the limit. Swedish architects have proposed a 34-story wooden building. Researchers and architects have designed an 80-story, one million square-foot giant at the Barbican in London. It would primarily be made of wood. It would be 984 feet tall. It would rank as the world's 18th tallest building. It would rank just ahead of Four World Trade Center in New York City.
 
The benefits of CLT are numerous. It is as strong as any old-growth timber. It is nearly as strong as steel. It can be made from leftover sawmill scraps. It can also be made from new material. Panels can be used as floors or walls. It uses fewer concrete or steel support structures. It may also use none at all. This means the overall weight of a building made from wood is far less. So it requires much less foundation concrete.
 
So if it's so great, why aren't cities sprouting mass timber buildings like a fertile garden? Partly, because building laws haven't caught up yet. And it's partly because it's not a known quantity.
 
"It's something new to the U.S. market. So there's a basic lack of familiarity with it," said David Barber. He is a fire engineer and principal with Australia-based design-build firm Arup. 

"Officials haven't touched it or seen it in construction, so there is a significant barrier. It's very hard to approve something when you've never seen it."
 
Fire also is a big question. Rightly so, given that wood is not only a building material but a fuel. Virtually every great city in history has also had one or more "great fires." They include Constantinople, Rome, London and New York.
 
Consequently, fire testing is extensive. It is demanding and therefore costly. It runs in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. This is even though timbers as thick as CLTs are slow to ignite. This is especially true when covered with drywall or gypsum board.
 
"It's not like putting a lot of little toothpicks up together," Kretschmann said. "These big massive panels require a lot of energy to burn."
 
In fact, CLTs do provide one potential advantage when it comes to fire. When enclosed within the wood structures, the steel and other fasteners are less likely to soften and fail in a fire event.
 
Seismic performance is another concern. And it is under investigation. Kretschmann's partner at FPL is Doug Rammer. He is participating in several National Science Foundation-funded projects. These will give a better understanding of how buildings with CLTs as a core design element can be better built to withstand earthquakes.
 
There's another aspect most people probably give little thought to. That is wind. Understanding how truly tall CLT high-rises, 40 stories or more, behave as they intrude into gusty open skies is another question. The industry is working towards finding the answer.
 
So for now, as CLTs slowly gain wider acceptance, Kretschmann and Rammer said they believe they'll mostly be used in buildings of somewhat lower heights. Those are in the neighborhood of 12 to 14 stories.
 
"We see it as a wonderful, complex material," said Kretschmann.

Filed Under:  
Assigned 18 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
What advantages does wood have over steel?
Write your answers in the comments section below


COMMENTS (0)
Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT