Monkey does not own rights to selfie
Monkey does not own rights to selfie Macaque monkey, Naruto's selfie snaps. (WikiMedia/David Slater)
Monkey does not own rights to selfie
Lexile: 700L

Assign to Google Classroom

A macaque monkey who took now-famous selfie photographs cannot be declared the copyright owner of the photos. That is what a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick made the decision. He was in a court in San Francisco.
The lawsuit was filed last year. It was filed by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.  It sought a court order. It wanted to represent the monkey.  PETA wanted the court to let it administer all proceeds from the photos for the benefit of the monkey. The animal was identified as 6-year-old Naruto. The proceeds would also go to other crested macaques living in a reserve. They live on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi.
The photos were taken during a 2011 trip to Sulawesi. An unattended camera was used to snap the images. The camera is owned by British nature photographer David Slater.  He asked the court to dismiss the case. Slater said a British copyright was obtained for the photos by his company, Wildlife Personalities Ltd. He said that copyright should be honored worldwide.
PETA sued Slater and his San Francisco-based self-publishing company. It's called Blurb.  The company published a book titled "Wildlife Personalities." The book includes the "monkey selfie" photos.
The photos have been widely distributed elsewhere. The distributing outlets include Wikipedia.  Those outlets contend that no one owns the copyright to the images.  They say that's because they were taken by an animal and not a person.
Slater described himself as a nature photographer in court documents.  He said he is deeply concerned about animal welfare.  He said it should up to the U.S. Congress and not a federal court to decide whether copyright law applies to animals.
Jeff Kerr is general counsel for PETA.  The organization will continue fighting for the monkey's rights, he said.
"Despite this setback, legal history was made today," Kerr said. "Because we argued to a federal court why Naruto should be the owner of the copyright rather than being seen as a piece of property himself."

Source URL:

Filed Under:  
Assigned 72 times
Why did it matter who owned the rights to the photo?
Write your answers in the comments section below

  • anjelias-str
    1/19/2016 - 10:47 a.m.

    Now budy argued about the monkeys until this case.

  • bagadr-fel
    1/20/2016 - 02:48 p.m.

    i fell the animals should be able to take the pictures!

  • mescol-fel
    1/20/2016 - 02:52 p.m.

    this article was very funny!!!

    • felmel-fel
      1/20/2016 - 04:25 p.m.

      Why did you think it was funny?

      • quiemi-fel
        1/25/2016 - 02:47 p.m.

        Because everyone loves selfies but its not a person who is taking the selfie its an animal which makes it interesting and funny.

    • mescoy-fel
      1/25/2016 - 02:52 p.m.

      I think it is funny to cole

  • edakay-fel
    1/25/2016 - 02:50 p.m.

    Well now I guess we shouid start to leave camras there

  • mescoy-fel
    1/25/2016 - 02:51 p.m.

    I think it would be cool to see pictures of the monkey taking selfies

  • bagadr-fel
    2/01/2016 - 02:56 p.m.

    I feel the same way mescoy that would be funny.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment