1st grade, 2nd grade, etc…fuggedaboudit!
1st grade, 2nd grade, etc…fuggedaboudit!
Forget about students spending one year in each grade, with the entire class learning the same skills at the same time. Districts from Alaska to Maine are taking a different route.
Instead of simply moving kids from one grade to the next as they get older, schools are grouping students by ability. Once they master a subject, they move up a level. This practice has been around for decades, but was generally used on a smaller scale, in individual grades, subjects or schools.
Now, in the latest effort to transform the bedraggled Kansas City, Mo. schools, the district is about to become what reform experts say is the largest one to try the approach. Starting this fall officials will begin switching 17,000 students to the new system to turnaround trailing schools and increase abysmal tests scores.
Here's how the reform works:
Students — often of varying ages — work at their own pace, meeting with teachers to decide what part of the curriculum to tackle. Teachers still instruct students as a group if it's needed, but often students are working individually or in small groups on projects that are tailored to their skill level.
For instance, in a classroom learning about currency, one group could draw pictures of pennies and nickels. A student who has mastered that skill might use pretend money to practice making change.
Students who progress quickly can finish high school material early and move forward with college coursework. Alternatively, in some districts, high-schoolers who need extra time can stick around for another year.
Advocates say the approach cuts down on discipline problems because advanced students aren't bored and struggling students aren't frustrated.
Kansas City officials hope the new system will help the district that's been beset with failure. A $2 billion desegregation case failed to boost test scores or stem the exodus of students to the suburbs and private and charter schools. The district has lost half its students and will close about 40 percent of its schools by the fall to avoid bankruptcy.
Covington wants to start the system in five elementary schools in hopes of spreading it through the upper grades once the bugs are worked out.
"This system precludes us from labeling children failures," Covington said. "It's not that you've failed, it's just that at this point you haven't mastered the competencies yet and when you do, you will move to the next level."
As it plans for the change, Kansas City teachers and administrators have visited and sought advice from a Denver area school district that uses the reform.
Adams County School District 50 has about 10,000 students this past school year its elementary and middle students made the shift. The reform will be phased into the high schools starting in the fall.
Count 11-year-old Alex Rodriguez as a convert to the new approach. He used to get bored after plowing through his assignments. He had to bring books from home or the library if he wanted a challenge because the ones at his old school were one or two grade levels too easy.
"I liked school," he said. "But it was hard sitting there and doing nothing."
His parents transferred the high achiever and his three younger siblings to the Denver area district after learning it was trying something new. His father, Richard Rodriguez, has been thrilled with the turnaround.
"I wish school was like this when I was growing up," he said.
There also is growing interest in Maine, where six districts, with a combined 11,248 students, are transitioning to the reform, starting with staff training and community meetings and gradually changing what happens in classrooms.
"It is incredible what is happening in the classrooms in Maine that are trying it," said Diana Doiron, who is overseeing the effort for the state's education department.
Education officials in Kansas City, Maine and elsewhere said part of the allure is the success other districts have after making the switch.
Marzano Research Laboratory, an educational research and professional development firm, evaluated 2009 state test data for over 3,500 students from 15 school districts in Alaska, Colorado, and Florida. Researchers found that students who learned through the different approach were 2.5 times more likely to score at a level that shows they have a good grasp of the material on exams for reading, writing, and mathematics.
Greg Johnson, director of curriculum and instruction for the Bering Strait School District in Alaska, recalled that before the switch there were students who had been on honor roll throughout high school then failed a test the state requires for graduation.
Now, he said if students are on pace to pass a class like Algebra I, the likelihood of them passing the state exam covering that material is more than 90 percent. He's proud of that accomplishment and said teachers love it.
"The most die-hard advocates for our system are our teachers because, especially the ones who were back with us before the change, they saw where things were then," he said. "They see where things are now and they don't want to go back."
Share on Facebook
- Posted on July 6, 2010
Animals
Art
Your stories
I wouldn't really like this because I would leave my friends or I will leave them. It's fun to make new friends but if I make too many I could forget everone's names!
I think that is a great idea! I wish we could do that in my school. We could finish school in a year and just have fun for the other time we have left.
If my school was like that my friends would so leave me behind. But I would make new friends that are older than me. It is shocking to think that could happen to my school and I hope my school doesn't do that. I can hardly keep up with the rest of my class in math. I still can't believe that my school could make it so you have to get it completely to move on.
personally i would like that because that the higher kids don't have to learn something they know and the lower kids are not like what? But the bad part would be that if you don't get something you stay on it for a long time
I think that is a good idea, I wish my school would do that. Sometimes things get so boring when other kids still aren't done and then we have to relearn the lesson.
I think I have mixed feelings about this. It's a good thing because instead of reviewing things over and over with a bunch of slow kids that do not understand, you could move on to another subject. Also, if you are really fast at learning things, then you could move on much more quickly and enter college, or high school at an early age. But it's also a bad thing because if your friends are kind of slow, then you would be leaving them and meeting new people all the time. It would also be kind of weird to be in a classroom with different people at different ages.
I wouldn't want my school like that.I think it would be more complicated to move up a level once you master it.I like my school the way it is.You move up a grade every year.Those are my reasons why i wouldn't want my school like that.
i think it is a good idea so we can graduate faster and we wont have to deal with changing diff rent class"s and moving around all the time cause then we just get punished for being late or we get count now we just show up to one class and learn everything we need to know in just one class i think its easier. for us
I think this is a good idea because now if we master something then we move up instead of cramming everything in one year. I also think this is a good idea because now we will only have to focus on one thing and if we master it we will have confidence in what we did and we will be passing that subject and wont have to worry about failing any other subject because it is just the matter of time and getting the subject down pat then moving up.
That is the best idea EVER! I hate it when you sit in class and review over, and over,and over, its so boring! I wish I could move but there is a fat chance that's going to happen. I loved this article and loved to comment on this.