Should all children get an outdoor education? In this Oct. 6, 2016, photo, from left, Outdoor School students Evie Larson, Lillyann Samson and Maya Herring run a test on pond water during a lesson at Camp Howard in Mount Hood National Forest near Corbett, Ore. (AP Photo/Don Ryan)
Should all children get an outdoor education?
Lexile

Editor’s Note: Voters in Oregon voted in favor of Measure 99. 

Each year, thousands of Oregon parents hug their kids goodbye and send them tramping into the wilderness for up to a week to learn about their state's natural wonders.
 
The Outdoor School program was groundbreaking when it started more than 50 years ago. Since then, more than 1 million children have enjoyed - or endured - this rite of passage. They participate at campsites scattered around the state of Oregon. The state's landscape includes a stormy coast, towering evergreen forests and a rugged high desert.
 
At the program's heyday, 90 percent of sixth-graders spent the week testing water samples. They studied fungi and dug through topsoil. Today, just half of Oregon's 11- and 12-year-olds take part. This is accomplished mostly through a patchwork of grants, fundraising, parent fees and charitable donations. A lack of money has forced many school districts to scrap the program. Some have whittled the program down to just a few days.
 
Now, backers of a statewide ballot measure want to use a slice of lottery proceeds to guarantee a week of Outdoor School for all children. If it passes, the measure would make Oregon the only state with dedicated funding for outdoor education, said Sarah Bodor. She is policy director for the North American Association for Environmental Education.
 
Opponents, however, say it would take away millions in lottery money critical to expanding Oregon business.
 
The push to fund Outdoor School dovetails with a national trend toward outdoor learning, Bodor said. More than two dozen states have developed environmental literacy plans. Educators have realized the importance of outdoor time for developing critical thinking and leadership skills, she said.
 
"But ... the outdoor component is the piece that very often gets left behind," Bodor said.
 
Measure 99 would cover that unfunded cost. It would take up to $22 million - or 4 percent a quarter - from the state lottery's economic development fund to send 50,000 fifth- or sixth-graders to Outdoor School each year.
 
To get the state funding, programs would have to meet certain criteria. These include a curriculum that includes the study of plants, animals, soil and water and lessons on the relationship between economic growth, natural resources and conservation.
 
"This is not a mandate. It's an offer. And we wanted to make sure it was a real one, which means providing sufficient funding to cover the cost of a good, high-quality program," said Rex Burkholder. He is chairman of the Measure 99 campaign committee.
 
Measure 99 had no organized opposition. Polls indicated it would pass. But not everyone is buying it.
 
State Sen. Betsy Johnson is a Democrat. She says lottery proceeds are for economic development, not camp. She worries Oregonians who remember their own Outdoor School experience will vote for the measure out of nostalgia. They won't understand it could hurt other programs, she says.
 
"It's so feel-good. It's so 'Oregon.' I just worry that people are not going to give it the level of scrutiny it deserves," Johnson said. "The assumption is Outdoor School ... will produce better citizens and good Oregonians. What's my metric to know if that really happens?"
 
Supporters point to a Portland State University study. It found that students who participated in Outdoor School had improved attendance. They also highlight surveys by the Multnomah Education Service District. It provides 7,000 students a year with Outdoor School. The surveys show the program boosts self-confidence and interest in math and science.
 
At a recent five-day camp in Mount Hood National Forest, sixth-graders from Portland's Jackson Middle School seemed unaware of the politics surrounding their adventure.
 
As a light drizzle fell, they dipped nets into a fog-cloaked pond. They were surrounded by stands of Douglas fir trees. The students sketched water bugs in notebooks. They tested the water's acidity and turbidity. Rainbow trout jumped just a few feet away. Each child wore a "wood cookie," a cross-section of a small log. It was decorated with beaded pins to denote their completion of field studies on plants, animals, soil and water.
 
"It's definitely better out here," said 11-year-old Maya Herring. She showed off her wood cookie festooned with beads and bling awarded by her counselor.
 
"You can actually feel the nature. It's not just saying, 'This is what this fern looks like.' You can actually feel the fern for yourself."

Filed Under:  
Assigned 616 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
Why is there a national trend toward outdoor learning?
Write your answers in the comments section below


COMMENTS (324)
  • nathanm14-ste
    11/18/2016 - 12:07 p.m.

    I think that being educated about the outdoors is very important. Especially for kids who weren't raised around the wilderness and wildlife. It gives these kind of kids a can have as chance to see the world from its natural perspective.

    • andreww-mcd
      12/02/2016 - 12:33 p.m.

      I agree I went to one of these camps and they are so fun and educational they always help me learn.

    • danikah-mcd
      12/04/2016 - 04:40 p.m.

      I like your comment because it is very true most kids live in the city. I'm my opinion.

    • kilaf-mcd
      12/04/2016 - 08:50 p.m.

      Yes, i see your point. Some people were raised far away from trees or any wild life. I bet they would love to do this program

    • makennag-mcd
      12/05/2016 - 11:43 p.m.

      Exactly what I think. Other kids should be able to experience the outdoors and learn about the environment. Everyone deserves a chance at learning about the world around us.

    • hollyg-mcd
      12/06/2016 - 06:40 p.m.

      I agree with you. The kids that weren't raised in the wilderness probably never went to a river or stuff like that. And if you go to outdoor school you can learn about different types of mosses and trees and go to rivers to look at fish or frogs. I think it is a good experience to learn in a different environment.

    • ashlynd-mcd
      12/06/2016 - 07:56 p.m.

      Yes, doing work outside is an interesting thing to do. I think it will help kids study more with the outdoors.

    • noahm-mcd
      12/08/2016 - 08:09 p.m.

      yes I think that it is important also because you could maybe not know if something was dangerous and hurt them self.

    • allisonf-mcd
      12/08/2016 - 11:22 p.m.

      I agree with you. To add on, I also think that it's important for kids to learn about their climate, while having a fun experience.

    • timmyo-mcd
      12/09/2016 - 09:46 p.m.

      I totally agree with this. There are some kids that just live in the city or the town and they don't really get to experience what it is like to be outdoors.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT