Uber self-driving cars hit the streets of San Francisco In this photo taken Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2016, Anthony Levandowski, head of Uber's self-driving program, speaks about their driverless car in San Francisco. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)
Uber self-driving cars hit the streets of San Francisco
Lexile

Uber is bringing a small number of self-driving cars to its ride-hailing service in San Francisco, a move likely to excite the city's tech-savvy population and certain to antagonize California regulators.
 
The launch in Uber's hometown expands a public pilot program the company started in Pittsburgh in September. The testing lets everyday people experience the cars as Uber works to identify glitches before expanding the technology's use in San Francisco and elsewhere.
 
California law, however, requires a test permit for self-driving prototype vehicles, and Uber does not have one. The company argues that the law doesn't apply because its cars require a human backup.
 
Uber has a history of testing legal boundaries. Although the company has been around less than a decade, it has argued with authorities around the world about how much of its drivers' histories should be covered in background checks and whether those drivers should be treated as contractors ineligible for employee benefits.
 
Uber's self-driving tests in San Francisco will begin with a "handful" of Volvo luxury SUVs - the company wouldn't release an exact number - that have been tricked out with sensors so they can steer, accelerate and brake, and even decide to change lanes. The cars will have an Uber employee behind the wheel to take over should the technology fail. Users of the app may be matched with a self-driving car, but can opt out if they prefer a human driver. Self-driven rides cost the same as ordinary ones.
 
The cars will be put to the test in the congested streets of San Francisco. Uber believes its technology is ready to handle all this safely, though its executives concede the vehicles are nowhere near able to drive without a human ready to take control in dicey situations.
 
There was room for improvement during a test drive attended by The Associated Press. The car was destined for a local pizza parlor, but didn't pull directly in front of the restaurant, and instead stopped in the middle of the street. The cars may strike some riders as over-cautious, too. During the test drive, one idled in a traffic jam even though an adjacent lane was clear, prompting the human driver to make the move himself.
 
Once testing is complete, the ultimate vision is to sell to the public technology which supporters argue will save thousands of lives because it doesn't drink, text, fall asleep or take dangerous risks.
 
Under state law, self-driving tests on public roads require a permit from the Department of Motor Vehicles. The department has issued permits to 20 companies, mostly a collection of traditional automakers and tech companies - but not Uber.
 
Uber argues that its cars aren't really autonomous, and thus aren't covered by the law. Under the law, an "autonomous vehicle" requires a permit if it can drive itself "without the active physical control or monitoring of a natural person."
 
According to Anthony Levandowski, the leader of Uber's self-driving program, Uber's cars simply aren't advanced enough to drive themselves without human monitoring. Therefore, the Volvos are not autonomous and do not require a permit.
 
In a statement, the DMV noted that 20 companies have permits to test hundreds of cars in California.
 
"Uber shall do the same," the statement said.
 
Operating without a permit arguably gives Uber a competitive advantage. Companies with one must report to the state all crashes and every instance in which a person takes control during testing. All that information is public. To receive a permit, a company must show proof of insurance, pay a $150 fee and agree that a human driver can take control of the vehicle.

Filed Under:  
Assigned 93 times
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTION
Why is Uber so interested in self-driving cars?
Write your answers in the comments section below


COMMENTS (23)
  • irisp-ste
    1/03/2017 - 08:55 a.m.

    As more people become interested in self-driving cars, more individuals will want to use Uber to experience riding in a car that is driven by itself. If more people want to use this new feature, Uber will receive more money.

  • zakrym-ste
    1/03/2017 - 01:21 p.m.

    I would not have one of these. I have a hard time getting in the car with other people. It would be hard for me to let the car do its own thing. I would have to have my hands on the wheel at all times

  • monicas-ste
    1/04/2017 - 01:48 p.m.

    That's crazy. I just hope that these cars will be as safe as the ones driven. This is pretty cool.

  • greysonh-smi
    1/05/2017 - 02:40 p.m.

    they should have self drivin uber cars all over the country not just San Francisco

  • kaileew-ste
    1/05/2017 - 09:02 p.m.

    Uber launched the self-driving car in its hometown. The cars are being tested on the streets of San Francisco. I do not think it is a good idea to test something on such busy roads. If something goes wrong, a lot of people could be effected by it.

  • jlilly-dav
    1/06/2017 - 08:00 a.m.

    In response to "Uber self-driving cars hit the streets of San Francisco," I agree/disagree that there should be self driving cars. One reason I disagree is that if it crashes there's no one in the driver seat which is more risky. Another reason i agree is that then other people don't have to drive the car . It says in the article, "but didn't pull directly in front of the restaurant," A third reason if it just stops in the middle of the road that can put you more at risk of getting in s crash. Even though it has pros and cons, I think
    It would be better if we didn't have self driving cars for people's safety.

  • parkerz-cel
    1/06/2017 - 09:05 a.m.

    I think uber is so interested in self driving cars because in today's society driving around drunk and reckless people can be a dangerous job. If an employee is still behind the wheel in case the system fails it gives the worker a better chance to focus on the passengers and make sure they're acting appropriate instead of having to take your eyes off of the road and look back causing the chance of wrecks to increase dramatically.

  • noahr-ste
    1/06/2017 - 09:40 a.m.

    Uber will grow very fast in San Francisco and spread quickly. Everyone will want to ride in the cars so the uber production will have a lot of money to spread.

  • piersonw-cel
    1/09/2017 - 10:39 a.m.

    It's a move that is likely to excite the city's tech-savvy population and is certain to antagonize California regulators.

  • daltons1-ste
    1/09/2017 - 01:22 p.m.

    The legal problems with Uber are ridiculous. Just let them do what they do and back off. What they do for people and technology is great.

Take the Quiz Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT